SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 48010/06
by Mile PETKOVIĆ and Dragana VIDENOVIĆ
against Serbia
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 16 March 2010 as a Chamber composed of:
and ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 7 November 2006,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The application was lodged by Mr Mile Petković (“the first applicant”) and Ms Dragana Videnović (“the second applicant”), Serbian nationals who were both born in 1953 and live in Beograd. They were represented before the Court by the second applicant, who runs a legal practice in Bor. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr S. Carić.
The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings to which they sere a party, while under Article 13 of the Convention they complained about the lack of an effective domestic remedy for procedural delay.
 On  30 October 2009 and 5 November 2009 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay them EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros) to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds nopublic policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
In of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

	Sally Dollé	
	Registrar	President