FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 10353/05
by Svetoslav Ivanov SHTEREV
against Bulgaria
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 23 March 2010 as a Chamber composed of:
and ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 March 2005,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The application was lodged by Mr Svetoslav Ivanov Shterev, a Bulgarian national who was born in 1964 and lives in Varna. He was represented before the Court by Mr T. Kasabov, a lawyer practising in Varna. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Dimova, of the Ministry of Justice.
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of the length of criminal proceedings against him, which continued from 1997 to 2004, and under Article 13 that he had no effective remedies in that regard.
On 15 September 2008 the Court communicated the application to the Government.
On 18 November 2008 and 20 January 2010 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under the terms of which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Bulgaria in respect of the facts giving rise to the present application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 1,150 euros. This sum, which was to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, would be converted into Bulgarian levs at the rate applicable on the date of payment and would be free of any taxes that might be chargeable to the applicant. It would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties agreed that this payment would constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds nopublic policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
In of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
	Claudia Westerdiek	Peer Lorenzen 
	Registrar	President