 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> DUMITRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 23365/15 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 432 (06 June 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2019/432.html Cite as: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD002336515, [2019] ECHR 432, CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD002336515 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF DUMITRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
( Application no. 23365/15and 9 other application s -
see appended list )
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
6 June 2019
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Dumitrescu and Others v. Romania ,
The European Court of Human Rights ( Fourth Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Georges Ravarani,
President,
Marko Bošnjak,
Péter Paczolay,
judges,
and
Liv
Tigerstedt
Acting
Deputy Section Registrar
,
THE FACTS
3 . The list of applicant s and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The applicant s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention . In applications nos. 58173/15and 2387/16, the applicants also raised other complaints under Article 3 of the Convention.THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION
6. The applicant s complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:Article 3
"No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."
7. The Court notes that the applicant s were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicant s ' detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case - law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96 - 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić , cited above, §§ 122 - 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07and 60800/08, §§ 149 - 159, 10 January 2012). 8. In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, as well as the Government ' s objection concerning the continuous situation of the applicants ' conditions of detention in some of the cases, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicant s ' conditions of detention were inadequate. 10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.III. REMAINING COMPLAINTS
11. In applications nos. 58173/15and 2387/16, the applicants also raised other complaints under Article 3 of the Convention. 12. The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, they either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that these parts of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.IV. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
13. Article 41 of the Convention provides:"If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party."
14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case - law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum s indicated in the appended table. 15. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, as set out in the appended table, admissible and the remainder of applications nos. 58173/15and 2387/16inadmissible;
3. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention ;
4. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant s , within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2019 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Liv Tigerstedt Georges Ravarani
Acting D eputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
( inadequate conditions of detention )
|
Application no. Date of introduction |
Applicant ' s name Date of birth
|
Representative ' s name and location |
Facility Start and end date Duration |
Sq. m. per inmate |
Specific grievances |
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] | |
|
|
15/06/2015 |
Virgil Dumitrescu 06/05/1979 |
Irina Maria Peter Bucharest |
Bucharest 10th Police Arrest 14/11/2012 to 18/12/2012 1 month and 5 days
Rahova Prison 18/12/2012 to 24/12/2013 1 year and 7 days
Giurgiu Prison 24/12/2013 to 21/07/2014 6 months and 28 days
Jilava Prison 21/07/2014 to 21/01/2016 1 year , 6 months and 1 day |
3.2 m²
2 m²
0.7 m²
1 - 2 m² |
lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, bunk beds, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities
overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of fresh air, no place to serve meal, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents
overcrowding (save for the period between 21/02- 30/05/2014), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, bunk beds, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate furniture
overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, no place to serve meal, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to potable water |
3,000 |
|
|
08/10/2015 |
Vasile Negrea 07/11/1984 |
|
Brașov Police Arrest 23/04/2015 to 07/07/2015 2 months and 15 days |
|
lack of fresh air, lack of an adequate place to serve meals, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, passive smoking |
1,000 |
|
|
05/01/2016 |
Florin-Bogdan-Robert Anghel 08/02/1991 |
|
Rahova Prison 30/03/2015 to 13/06/2016 1 year , 2 months and 15 days |
1.9 - 2.7 m² |
overcrowding (save for the period 17/09- 02/10/2015) |
3,000 |
|
|
28/01/2016 |
Nicu Greere 01/03/1985 |
|
Olt Police Arrest 30/03/2015 to 29/04/2015 1 month
Craiova Prison 29/04/2015 to 07/07/2016 1 year , 2 months and 9 days |
4.1 m²
1.3 - 1.6 m² |
lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture
overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities |
3,000 |
|
|
04/03/2016 |
Ioan Dălălău 01/05/1970 |
Irina Maria Peter Bucharest |
Mureş Police Arrest, Târgu Mureş, Jilava, Arad, Aiud, Deva, Bistriţa, Gherla Prisons and Jilava, Rahova, Colibaşi and Dej Prison Hospitals 10/04/2001 to 25/01/2017 15 years , 9 months and 16 days |
1.4-2.7 m² |
overcrowding (save for the periods between 29/08-05/09/2011, 22/06/2012 - 10/01/2013, 24/06- 10/07/2014, 09/10- 28/10/2014 and 27/01- 09/02/2015), poor quality of food, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of potable water (Jilava Prison), infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature |
5,000 |
|
|
15/07/2016 |
Petre Argeșanu 25/10/1972 |
|
Colibași Prison 28/10/2014 to 14/06/2017 2 years , 7 months and 18 days |
2.2 m² |
overcrowding (save for the periods between 25/11/2016 - 21/04/2017 and 27/04- 25/05/2017), lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, bunk beds |
3,000 |
|
|
01/08/2016 |
Lucian-Mihai Covaci 03/08/1982 |
|
Aiud Prison 22/08/2014 to 28/03/2017 2 years , 7 months and 7 days |
2.4 - 2.6 m² |
overcrowding (save for the periods between 16-26/04/2015, 23/06- 15/09/2015 and 08/12/2015 - 29/02/2016), lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of toiletries, infestation of cell with insects/rodents |
3,000 |
|
|
13/09/2016 |
Georgică Apetri 02/08/1975 |
|
Colibași Prison 09/03/2015 to 04/05/2017 2 years , 1 month and 26 days |
2.2 - 2.5 m² |
overcrowding (save for the period between 10-14/05/2016), infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, bunk beds, inadequate temperature |
3,000 |
|
|
08/02/2017 |
Ancu Ion 22/01/1974 |
|
Bucharest Central Arrest, Rahova, Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons 19/11/2013 to 15/11/2016 2 years , 11 months and 28 days |
1.6 - 2.8 m² |
overcrowding (save for the periods between 07/04- 16/06/2015, 22/07- 05/08/2015 and 19/08- 05/10/2015), lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities
|
3,000 |
|
|
07/10/2016 |
Marian Pătrașcu 03/04/1984 |
Ionela Mărgărit Bucharest |
Galați Police Arrest 19/07/2013 to 16/09/2013 1 month and 29 days
Galați and Brăila Prisons 16/09/2013 pending More than 5 years , 6 months and 19 days |
2.3 m²
1.3 - 2.5 m² |
overcrowding
overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, no or restricted access to potable water (Galați Prison) |
5,000 |
[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.