KLYACHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 38521/16 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Second Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 856 (02 November 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KLYACHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 38521/16 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Second Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 856 (02 November 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/856.html
Cite as: [2023] ECHR 856

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF KLYACHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 38521/16 and 41 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT
 

STRASBOURG

2 November 2023

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Klyachkov and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
 Frédéric Krenc,
 Davor Derenčinović, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 12 October 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 3 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

"No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."


8.  Some applicants also complained that they had not been afforded an effective domestic remedy in respect of their grievances under Article 3, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, reading as follows:

"Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity."


9.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article 3 of the Convention.


10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants' confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.


12.  In view of the above findings under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants' complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (for similar approach see Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019).

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


13.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, concerning conditions of transport of detainees and the lack of a speedy review of detention matters; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012, as regards the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning the lack of an effective remedy for the complaint about inadequate conditions during transport; Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018, concerning restrictions in connection with family visits for prisoners detained on remand; and Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, concerning a delayed release of a prisoner).

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


14.  Article 41 of the Convention provides:

"If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party."


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants' complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the applications admissible;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the applicants' placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds that it is not necessary to examine separately the applicants' complaints under Article 13 of the Convention in relation to the lack of an effective domestic remedy to complain about placement in a metal cage in a courtroom;
  7. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 2 November 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the court

Date of the relevant judgment

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]

  1.    

38521/16

17/06/2016

Dmitriy Nikolayevich KLYACHKOV

1981

 

 

Basmannyy District Court of Moscow, Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg

03/04/2016

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 03/04/2015 - 03/04/2016 - transport in a single-prisoner cubicle; 0.49 sq. m. of personal space, no ventilation, no windows, inadequate temperature, transported on multiple occasions, duration of 2-4 hours on each occasion (Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 et al.,

9 April 2019, §§ 137-40);

 

Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - pre-trial detention of a former investigator on charges of abuse of powers and falsification of evidence from 06/04/2015 to 02/04/2016, last appeal against the extension order - St Petersburg City Court, 04/03/2016; failure to assess the applicant's personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts;

 

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal against the decision extending the applicant's pre-trial detention on 02/10/2015 (Basmannyy District Court of Moscow) was examined on 15/03/2016 (Moscow City Court).

Appeal against the decision extending the applicant's pre-trial detention on 30/12/2015 (Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg) was examined on 04/03/2016 (St Petersburg City Court);

 

Art. 8 (1) - restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities - limitation on visits in remand prison: the applicant complained that, within the period of his detention in the SIZO-1 of Moscow and SIZO-1 St Petersburg (03/04/2015 - 03/04/2016) he was allowed visits with his wife only twice

9,750

  1.    

20728/17

27/02/2017

Viktor Vladimirovich SOSNIN

1975

 

 

Cherepovets Town Court

20/02/2017

 

7,500

  1.    

47409/17

25/06/2017

Zhelavdi Nasrudinovich GERIYEV

1993

Yermolayeva Nadezhda Viktorovna

Moscow

Shalinskiy Town Court of the Chechen Republic, Supreme Court of the Chechen Republic

28/12/2016

 

7,500

  1.    

70513/17

28/04/2017

Sergey Anatolyevich KNYAZEV

1970

 

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

02/11/2017

 

7,500

  1.    

74882/17

26/08/2017

Aleksandr Valeriyevich BOKHONOV

1975

 

 

Noginsk Town Court of the Moscow Region

Video-link from SIZO,

Shchyolkovo Town Court of the Moscow Region

29/03/2018;

Video-link from SIZO

05/09/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - 05/09/2018 - 06/09/2018, delay of almost 30 hours in releasing the applicant (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018)

9,750

  1.    

36597/18

20/07/2018

Andrey Alekseyevich TETERIN

1979

Pekteyeva Nataliya Alekseyevna

Moscow

Moskovskiy District Court of Cheboksary, Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

17/04/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

38005/18

28/07/2018

Lechi Khamzatovich BOLATBAYEV

1975

Magomedova Roza Saidovna

Moscow

Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow

06/11/2018

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - the applicant's appeals against the detention orders of the Moscow City Court of 16/01/2018 and of the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow of 19/04/2018 were examined on 06/03/2018 and 30/05/2018, respectively

 

8,000

  1.    

38870/18

02/08/2018

Konstantin Grigoryevich SUPRYADKIN

1980

 

 

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar

13/07/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by train on 27/08/2018 and 28/08/2018; insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, passive smoking

9,750

  1.    

38872/18

01/08/2018

Aleksandr Yuryevich GRIGORYEV

1971

Smirnova Anna Vladimirovna

Moscow

Rostov Regional Court

15/08/2019

 

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal against the detention order of the Leninskiy District Court of Rostov-on-Don of 04/06/2018 was examined by the Rostov Regional Court on 05/07/2018 (appeal lodged on 07/06/2018)

8,000

  1.  

39937/18

10/08/2018

Aleksandr Olegovich EBINGARD

1988

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

Syktyvkar Town Court

12/02/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

39953/18

15/08/2018

Aleksey Feodosyevich OSOKIN

1970

Ryumin Yevgeniy Guryevich

Vologda

Vologda Town Court

17/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

40611/18

15/08/2018

Pavel Aleksandrovich FOMICHEV

1985

 

 

Sokolskiy District Court of Vologda Region

29/03/2018

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - on numerous occasions between 20/02/2017 and 29/03/2018 the applicant was transported between the remand prison and the courthouse in a single compartment measuring 0,3 sq. m. The trips lasted each time one hour. At the courthouse he was placed in a cell measuring 4 sq. m with two other inmates. There was no ventilation, windows or lighting.

 

8,500

  1.  

41569/18

13/08/2018

Maksim Gennadyevich RYLCHSHIKOV

1987

 

 

Justice of the Peace of the Morozovskiy Judicial Circuit of Syktyvkar

23/05/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

41691/18

16/08/2018

Vitaliy Vladimirovich VESELKOV

1977

Ikhsanov Albert Flyurovich

Izhevsk

Agryz District Court, Tatarstan Republic

26/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

41766/18

15/08/2018

Yevgeniy Valeryevich BAZHUKOV

1984

 

 

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar

27/11/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

42017/18

22/08/2018

Aleksandr Viktorovich ZOLOTAREV

1979

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich

Nizhniy Tagil

Ordzhonikidzevskiy District Court of Yekaterinburg

21/03/2018

 

 

7,500

  1.  

45962/18

10/09/2018

Semen Romanovich GRYAZEV

1997

 

 

Lefortovo District Court of Moscow

08/05/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

47301/18

01/07/2019

Sergey Anatolyevich SKOBELIN

1985

 

 

Zabaykalskiy Region Court

11/01/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

48919/18

01/10/2018

Igor Nikolayevich SEROV

1976

 

 

Bor Town Court

23/08/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - from 26/05/2017 to 27/08/2018: van; 0.3 sq. m of personal space; lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light

 

8,500

  1.  

48934/18

01/10/2018

Pavel Yuryevich STEPANENKO

1976

 

 

Traktorozavodskiy District Court of Volgograd

22/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

50630/18

18/10/2018

Maksim Yevgenyevich YEGOROV

1996

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Moskovskiy District Court of Kaliningrad

07/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

50639/18

18/10/2018

Igor Olegovich ZAGUMENNYY

1989

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Leningradskiy District Court of Kaliningrad

31/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

51223/18

20/10/2018

Vadim Vladimirovich KASHKIN

1969

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen

05/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

51644/18

16/10/2018

Rinat Ildusovich MAMETOV

1989

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Uvatskiy District Court of the Tyumen Region

24/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

55027/18

24/10/2018

Nikitia Vladimirovich DEMKOV

1999

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Leninskiy District Court of Kaliningrad

05/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

55422/18

08/11/2018

Aleksandr Vladimirovich BELTYUKOV

1988

 

 

Justice of the Peace for judicial circuit no. 5 of the Leninskiy judicial district of Tyumen

15/05/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

55598/18

13/11/2018

Vyacheslav Robertovich SHATROVSKIY

1969

Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich

Velikiy Novgorod

Tverskoy District Court of Moscow

24/05/2018

Moscow City Court, video link from IK-5 Kirov Region

20/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

55653/18

16/11/2018

Pavel Andreyevich TERENIN

1988

Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna

St Petersburg

Dzerzhinskiy District Court of St Petersburg

15/10/2018

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous transfers between the remand prison and the courthouse in an overcrowded van (10 to 12 inmates per compartment); transfers lasted from 1 to 1.5 hours; since 23/05/2018;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

55690/18

10/11/2018

Yevgeniy Yuryevich BAUROV

1991

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

Syktyvkar Town Court

11/05/2018

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by van on numerous occasions between the detention facility and the courthouse in the period between 06/06/2017 and 11/05/2018; overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of fresh air

8,500

  1.  

55731/18

12/11/2018

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BERCHENKO

1988

Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich

St Petersburg

Vyborgskiy City Court of the Leningrad Region

14/12/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - multiple transfers by van from the detention facilities to a courthouse from 30/03/2017 to 08/04/2019; overcrowding (15 inmates were placed in a compartment measuring 3 sq. m); transfers lasted 3 hours;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

55741/18

03/11/2018

Sergey Aleksandrovich GAVRILYUK

1985

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Moskovskiy District Court of Kaliningrad

24/05/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

55758/18

03/11/2018

Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich KOSTYANYUK

1992

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Surgut Town Court

17/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

55760/18

08/10/2018

Aleksandr Valentinovich SAKSIN

1963

 

 

Leninskiy District Court, Sovetskiy District Court, Tsentralnyy District Court and Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

08/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

56256/18

03/11/2018

Sergey Nikolayevich OVCHINNIKOV

1959

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

04/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

57269/18

21/11/2018

Grigoriy Aleksandrovich PROKOFYEV

1968

 

 

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Irkutsk

17/06/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

57308/18

29/10/2018

Maksim Vadimovich LUKIN

1994

 

 

Surgut Town Court

09/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

57820/18

19/11/2018

Kirill Viktorovich GOLOVASHKIN

1991

Alekseyenko Dmitriy Andreyevich

Nizhniy Novgorod

Sormovskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod

03/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

57831/18

19/11/2018

Andrey Ildarovich GILVANOV

1990

 

 

Sormovskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod

03/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

58064/18

26/11/2018

Tural Orudzh Ogly YUSIFLI

1993

 

 

 

Leninskiy District Court of Tyumen

09/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

58274/18

28/11/2018

Vasiliy Valerianovich KISKI

1983

 

 

Leninskiy District Court of Ulyanovsk

01/10/2018

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van and train from 03/02/2017 to 07/10/2018; was placed in single compartment: transfers lasted from 1.5 to 2 hours; lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature

8,500

  1.  

58528/18

05/12/2018

Yegor Vladimirovich NOSKOV

1981

Medvedeva Anna Olegovna

Moscow

Basmannyy District Court and Savelovskiy District Court of Moscow

14/11/2019

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport in van from 24/01/2018 to 01/04/2019: passive smoking, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, accommodation with inmates under stricter regime, transfers (both ways) lasted 8 hours;

 

 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

 

8,500

  1.  

58551/18

26/11/2018

Yevgeniy Petrovich VASILYEV

1977

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen

31/08/2018

 

7,500

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/856.html