 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> DMITRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 4604/17 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 147 (15 February 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/147.html Cite as: [2024] ECHR 147 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF DMITRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 4604/17 and 38 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
15 February 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Dmitriyeva and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 25 January 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019, and Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017 as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, related to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65 concerning the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.
14. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remainder of the applicants' complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning alleged restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
15. Mr Gumerbayev (application no. 3864/18) alleged a violation of his rights set out in Articles 6 and 11 of the Convention in connection with his participation in a public assembly on 14 May 2017 and ensuing administrative proceedings. Mr Shuvatov (application no. 21312/21) complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the lack of impartiality of domestic courts. The Court has examined the complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of applications nos. 3864/18 and 21312/21 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 15 February 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth | Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative charges | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
04/01/2017 | Mariya Borisovna DMITRIYEVA 1961 |
| Manifestation in support of N. Savchenko
Moscow
08/03/2016
| article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 08/07/2016
Moscow City Court 28/07/2016 | Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - the applicant was convicted under Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO by the final decision adopted by Moscow City Court on 08/07/2016 and under Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO by final decision of Moscow City Court on 28/07/2016 concerning the same event on 08/03/2016. The applicant complains about being punished twice for the same offence | 3,500 | |
14/01/2017 | Lyudmila Andreyevna PUDRIK 1955 |
| Manifestation in support of N. Savchenko
Moscow
08/03/2016 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000;
fine of RUB 500 | Moscow City Court 20/07/2016 (both decisions on the same day) | Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - convicted twice for the same public event (under Articles 20.2 § 5 and 19.3 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences) | 3,500 | |
30/01/2017 | Aleksandr Vladimirovich EYSMAN 1974 |
| Public gathering dedicated to the Constitution Day
Moscow
12/12/2015
Public gathering
Moscow
30/05/2018 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 02/08/2016
Moscow City Court 04/10/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - administrative arrest and detention on 30/05/2018 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO e.g. to establish the suspect's identity, raised in administrative proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - three sets of the administrative offence proceedings which ended with the final decisions on 02/08/2016, 04/10/2018, 16/01/2017, by the Moscow City Court;
Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - on 08/03/2016, Moscow, Manezhnaya square, a solo demonstration next to the Zhukov monument with a banner relating to Savchenko; article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 15,000; conviction by the final decision of the Moscow City Court on 16/01/2017; rotation - event classified as assembly post facto, ban on public events next to the Residence of the President of the Russian Federation (Zhukov monument on Manezhnaya square) | 4,000 | |
06/05/2017 | Yelena Yuryevna STARSHININA 1977 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Hunger strike in support of housing rights near the United Russia's headquarters
Moscow
01/07/2016
Hunger strike in support of housing rights near the United Russia's headquarters
Moscow
01/07/2016
Hunger strike in support of housing rights near the United Russia's headquarters
Moscow
02/07/2016 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 22/05/2017
Moscow City Court 16/11/2016
Moscow City Court 22/05/2017 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - absence of the prosecutor in three sets of the proceedings which ended with the final decisions on 16/11/2016 and 22/05/2017, Moscow City Court | 4,000 | |
15/12/2017 | Aleksandr Dmitriyevich TURBIN 1992 |
| Anti-corruption Manifestation
St Petersburg
12/06/2017
Anti-corruption Manifestation
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | arrest of 5 days
fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 16/06/2017
St Petersburg City Court 30/06/2017 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - the complaint is raised in respect of both sets of the proceedings against the applicant which ended on 16/06/2017 and 30/06/2017.
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - final decisions on 16/06/2017, by the St Petersburg City Court, Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO; and on 30/06/2017, by the St Petersburg City Court, Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings. | 5,000 | |
29/12/2017 | Anatoliy Viktorovich ZVEREV 1993 | Smorodina Polina Romanovna St Peterburg | Anti-corruption manifestation
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 1,000 | St Petersburg City Court 03/07/2017 (both decisions issued on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention at the police station from 12/06/2017 to 13/06/2017 - the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled. The applicant raised the relevant complaint in the course of the administrative proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - final decisions on 03/07/2017, by the St Petersburg City Court, Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings. | 4,000 | |
25/12/2017 | Nikolay Nikolayevich MANKO 1967 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Truck Drivers' Manifestation
Khimki, Moscow Region
21/05/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 500
fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow Regional Court 06/07/2017 (both decisions on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/05/2017 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence. The applicant raises the complaint in the course of the administrative proceedings against him;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - decisions on 06/07/2017, by the Moscow City Court, Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/12/2017 | Pavel Vladimirovich SHALAGIN 1985 | Yesipova Alina Vladimirovna St Petersburg | Anti-corruption Manifestation
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 11,000 | St Petersburg City Court 29/06/2017 (both decisions on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escort to the police station on 12/06/2017-13/06/2017 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence; unrecorded detention until escort to the court on 14/06/2017. The applicant raised the complaint in the course of the administrative proceedings against him;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - final decision in both sets of proceedings - 29/06/2017, St Petersburg City Court; Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings.
| 4,000 | |
26/12/2017 | Iskander Rafailevich GUMERBAYEV 1991 |
| Anti-corruption Manifestation
Kazan
14/05/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | community service of 35 hours | Supreme Court of Tatarstan Republic 21/06/2017 (sent by the Supreme Court to the applicant on 26/06/2017) | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party | 4,000 | |
02/01/2018 | Anastasiya Vyacheslavovna KOVROVA 1987 | Yesipova Alina Vladimirovna St Petersburg | Anti-Corruption Manifestation
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 600 | St Petersburg City Court 03/07/2017 (both decisions on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention at the police station from 12/06/2017 to 13/06/2017 - (1) Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's; (2) Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - decisions on 03/07/2017, by the St Petersburg City Court, Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings
| 4,000 | |
10/01/2018 | Aleksey Mikhaylovich IVANOV 1990 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Opposition rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 1,000 | St Petersburg City Court 11/07/2017 (both decisions on the same day) | Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - the applicant was punished twice for essentially the same action under article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 19.3 § 1 of CAO;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
22/02/2018 | Igor Nikolayevich FINKOVSKIY 1964 | Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow | Truck Drivers' Manifestation
Khimki, Moscow Region
21/05/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow Regional Court 22/08/2017 | Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - decisions on 22/08/2017, by the St Petersburg City Court and on 16/08/2017 by the St Peterburg City Court, Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 21-22/05/2017 in excess of 3 hours (arrested on 21/05/2017 at 2 p.m., released on 23/05/2017); raised on appeal
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision on 22/08/2017 | 4,000 | |
30/03/2018 | Rafail Viktorovich SHEPELEV 1970 |
| March of the "Artpodgotovka" movement
Ekaterinburg
23/07/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 21/11/2017 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - lack of the prosecuting party in the administrative proceedings
| 3,500 | |
25/04/2018 | Polina Pavlovna MIKHAYLOVA 1999 |
| Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
08/10/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | detention for 5 days and fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 25/10/2017 (both decisions on the same day) | Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings decisions on 25/10/2017, St Petersburg City Court, Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 08/10/2017 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of an administrative offence (arrested at 10.20 p.m. and detained till the court hearing on 09/10/2017); raised on appeal;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
15/05/2018 | Margarita Yuryevna ZAYTSEVA 1970 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Tambov
29/10/2017
| article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | arrest for 5 days | Tambov Regional Court 15/11/2017 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
18/05/2018 (3 applicants) | Mikhail Mikhaylovich SEMENOV 1969
Artur Magsumovich ABASHEV 1986
Georgiy Olegovich USPENSKIY 1999
| Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | 1 applicant: Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kirov
07/10/2017
2 applicant: Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kirov
07/10/2017
3 applicant: Meeting "Voters Strike"
Kirov
28/01/2018
1 applicant: Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Kirov 30/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | detention of five days
detention of five days
fine of RUB 20,000
the fine was lifted on appeal | Kirov Regional Court 24/11/2017
Kirov Regional Court 27/02/2018
Kirov Regional Court 06/03/2018
Kirov Regional Court 23/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - the first applicant complained of the absence of a prosecuting party in the admin. proceedings in 2022 | 5,000, to each of the applicants | |
16/07/2018 | Aleksandr Sergeyevich VESELOV 1984 |
| Russian March
Moscow
04/11/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 14/03/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 04/11/2017 - Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO; raised in the course of administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
11/08/2018 | Yuliya Aleksandrovna FEDOSEYEVA 1978 |
| Spontaneous meeting against local waste site
Klin, Moscow Region
13/10/2017 | Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow Regional Court 15/02/2018 |
| 3,500 | |
14/08/2018 | Dmitriy Vasilyevich DUBROVIN 1997 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | "Voters' Strike"
Volgograd
28/01/2018 | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Volgograd Regional Court 21/02/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded - arrest and detention on 28/01/2018 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised on appeal;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/08/2018 | Dmitriy Mikhaylovich TEPLYAKOV 1987 |
| Anti-corruption manifestation
Moscow
04/11/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 28/02/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
22/08/2018 | Artem Yevgenyevich YEVDOKIMOV 1991 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Distribution of political leaflets
Cherepovets
04/11/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Vologda Regional Court 27/02/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
20/09/2018 | Tatyana Sergeyevna SERGEYEVA 1972 | Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow | Manifestation of the foreign currency mortgage borrowers in front of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation
Moscow
28/11/2017 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 20/03/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
20/05/2019 | Mikhail Igorevich SHALASHNYY 1998 |
| "Endless protest" activists' meeting
Moscow
10/09/2018 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 22/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
16/06/2019 | Yuriy Sergeyevich KURLYKOV 1999 | Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok | Manifestation against the pension reform
Vladivostok 15/09/2018 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court 17/12/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
07/07/2019 | Aydar Albertovich ISLAMOV 1996 | Tomilov Nikita Sergeyevich BERLIN | Protest against construction of an orthodox church in a park
Yekaterinburg
14/05/2019 | article 20.1 § 2 of CAO | 5 days' arrest | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 18/05/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 14/05/2019 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
17/08/2019 | Aleksandr Alekseyevich ABRAMOV 1997 |
| Manifestation against the pension reform
Penza
09/08/2018 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Penza Regional Court 14/03/2019 |
| 3,500 | |
27/09/2019 | Valeriy Aleksandrovich SHPYAKIN 1994 |
| Manifestation against the construction of the landfill at Sheis
Arkhangelsk
07/04/2019
| article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Arkhangelsk Regional Court 23/07/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
18/10/2019 | Aleksey Aleksandrovich CHISLOV 1987 | Zadorkin Anton Vyacheslavovich Yekarerinburg | Manifestation against construction of an orthodox church
Oktyabrskaya Square 2, Yekaterinburg
16/05/2019 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 28/08/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest on 16/05/2019 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect for the purposes of compiling an offence record: no written record of the administrative escort (Art. 27.2 § 3 CAO);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
28/12/2019 | Yan Patvakanovich YEGIAZARYAN 1977 | Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich Yekaterinburg | Manifestation against the regional authorities
Yekaterinburg
07/07/2019 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 11/09/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
28/12/2019 | Galina Vasilyevna KOROLEVA 1952 | Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich Yekaterinburg | Manifestation against the regional authorities
Yekaterinburg
07/07/2019 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 02/10/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
24/01/2020 | Igor Vladimirovich SAFONOV 1991 | Timakova Kristina Igorevna Moscow | Protest against demolition of the "Solovey" cinema
Moscow 23/11/2018 | article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | fine of RUB 100,000 | Moscow City Court 24/07/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
05/12/2020 | Sofya Vladimirovna DURNOVA 2001 | Sirosh Fedor Yevgenyevich Moscow | Dopuskai Manifestation for free elections
Moscow
03/08/2019 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 10/06/2020 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 03/08/2019 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity | 4,000 | |
18/01/2021 | Tatyana Valeryevna NAMAZBAYEVA 1989 | Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok | Manifestation in support of Furgal
Vladivostok
25/07/2020
Manifestation in support of Furgal
Vladivostok
01/08/2020 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court 05/10/2020
Primorye Regional Court 13/10/2020 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 01/08/2020 and on 15/08/2020 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/01/2021 | Larisa Vasilyeva ALEKSEYEVA 1946 | Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok | Manifestation in support of Furgal
Vladivostok, Svetlanskaya street
01/08/2020 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court 16/11/2020 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative proceedings which ended on 02/11/2020 and 16/11/2020 respectively;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention at a police station on 15/08/2020 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised on appeal;
Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - solo picket against unfair elections on 15/08/2020 in Vladivostok, the applicant convicted under article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, administrative fine of RUB 10,000. Upheld on appeal - by the Primorye Regional Court, 02/11/2020. | 4,000 | |
14/03/2021 | Valentina Anatolyevna DYUMINA 1989 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Krasnoyarsk
01/08/2020
Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Krasnoyarsk
08/08/2020 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000
fine of RUB 20,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 29/10/2020
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 24/09/2020 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 08/08/2020 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity | 4,000 | |
22/03/2021 | Andrey Yuryevich MYAKOTIN 1974 | Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok | Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Vladivostok
18/07/2020
Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Vladivostok
25/07/2020
Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Vladivostok
08/08/2020
Manifestation in support of Mr. Navalnyy
Vladivostok
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | 20 hours of compulsory work
20 hours of compulsory work
20 hours of compulsory work
40 hours of compulsory work | Primorye Regional Court 26/10/2020
Primorye Regional Court 02/11/2020
Primorye Regional Court 27/10/2020
Primorye Regional Court 13/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - Arrest and detention at the police station on 15/08/2020 and 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity. The complaint was raised on appeal in the course of the administrative proceedings.
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - administrative proceedings relating to the applicant's participation in the manifestation on 31/01/2021 | 5,000 | |
02/04/2021 | Aleksey Nikolayevich SHUVATOV 1992 | Sidelnikova Polina Aleksandrovna Vladivostok | Manifestation in support of protests in Khabarovsk
Vladivostok
19/07/2020
Manifestation in support of protests in Khabarovsk
Vladivostok
25/07/2020 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court 09/11/2020
Primorye Regional Court 09/11/2020 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 22/08/2020 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence | 4,000 | |
22/03/2021 | Aleksey Vladimirovich BARICH 1993 |
| Manifestation in support of protests in Khabarovsk
St Petersburg
01/08/2020
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy ("Otpuskay")
St Petersburg
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | 7 days' detention
15 days' detention | St Petersburg City Court 24/09/2020
St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and overnight detention on 31/01-02/02/2021 - (1) Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; (2) Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - concerning both public events and respective proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of administrative detention (in respect of the event of 23/01/2021) | 6,000 | |
09/04/2021 | Yevgeniy Olegovich RUDENKO 1996 | Sidelnikova Polina Aleksandrovna Vladivostok | Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Vladivostok
18/07/2020
Manifestation in support of S. Furgal
Vladivostok
19/07/2020 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court 24/11/2020
Primorye Regional Court 24/11/2020 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - on 26/08/2020 the applicant was arrested at his office in relation to his participation in two manifestations, more than one month after the events in question - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the domestic proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative offence proceedings | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.