PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 40486/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 220 (14 March 2024)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 40486/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 220 (14 March 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/220.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 220

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 40486/21 and 27 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

14 March 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Pankratov and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
 Frédéric Krenc,
 Davor Derenčinović, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 15 February 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-142, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport; Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant's personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in administrative offence proceedings in order to identify, locate and arrest him.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to the facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under

 well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

40486/21

27/07/2021

Roman Sergeyevich PANKRATOV

1985

Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna

Kolomna

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 12 days

Moscow City Court

12/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 5.00 p.m., taken before the court directly from the police station on 01/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transfer in a police van on 01/02/2021-02/02/2021 (the applicant spent the night in the police van), 23 persons held in the van at the same time, seats were not available to all, no drinking water, no meals

6,000

  1.    

2052/22

14/12/2021

Sergey Aleksandrovich KHLYABICH

1968

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

29/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.02 p.m., brought to the police station at 4.00 p.m., released at 11.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

2060/22

14/12/2021

Anatoliy Dmitriyevich BALAYEV

1999

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

23/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021, brought to the police station at 10 p.m. on the same day, released at 1.10 a.m. on 24/01/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

2082/22

14/12/2021

Fedor Mikhaylovich STETSKEVICH

1985

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

17/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 6.40 p.m., released at 00.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

2085/22

14/12/2021

Ilya Olegovich KOPANEV

1993

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

17/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 4.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 7 p.m., released on 1.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

2090/22

14/12/2021

Igor Vadimovich LEPILIN

1993

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally " Free Navalnyy"

 

Yekaterinburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

community work of

20 hours

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

15/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.40 p.m., brought to the police station at 4.05 p.m., released at 5.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

2103/22

15/12/2021

Mikhail Alekseyevich BASOV

2002

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

24/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 1:.0 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 3.50 p.m., released at 9.10 p.m. on the same day without the report in question, which was issued on 12/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

2114/22

15/12/2021

Yevgeniy Sergeyevich ZAKHRYAPIN

1994

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

25/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 5 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 7.30 p.m., released at 11 p.m. on the same day),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

4,000

  1.    

2164/22

15/12/2021

Aleksey Mikhaylovich OCHAN

1974

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

29/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record (arrested at 3.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 4.05 p.m., released at 10:30 p.m.),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

2166/22

15/12/2021

Kirill Olegovich SHEVYAKIN

2000

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Ryazan

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2.2

§ 1 of CAO

fine of RUB

5,000

Ryazan Regional Court

15/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 7.40 p.m. on 21/04/2021, brought to the police station at 8.10 p.m., brought before the court directly from the police station at 12.30 p.m. on 22/04/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

2170/22

15/12/2021

Irina Petrovna KONEVSKAYA

1987

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

05/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report (arrested at 2 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 4 p.m. on the same day, taken before the court directly from the police station at 9 p.m. on 01/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

2203/22

28/12/2021

Dariya Sergeyevna KOKAREVA

1991

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

29/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 8.15 p.m. on 23/01/2021, taken to the police station at 11.00 p.m., released at 3.15 a.m. on 24/01/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

2876/22

09/12/2021

Yuriy Alekseyevich OGORELTSEV

1999

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

11/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.50 p.m. to 11.55 p.m. on 23/01/2021

 

 

4,000

  1.  

3536/22

17/12/2021

Nikita Anatolyevich VAULIN

1985

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Yekaterinburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

community work of

 30 hours

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

22/09/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

3,500

  1.  

4328/22

30/12/2021

Gleb Vladimirovich MIKHNOVETS

1993

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

05/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.30 p.m., brought to the police station at 5 p.m., released at 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

4335/22

30/12/2021

Yelena Vladimirovna SHAGURINA

1992

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Vladimir

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Vladimir Regional Court

12/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 1.35 p.m., brought to the police station at 2 p.m., released at 5 p.m. on 31/01/2021 without offence report, which was drawn up later, on 12/05/2021 in the applicant's absence),

 

Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction (raised on appeal)

5,000

  1.  

4341/22

30/12/2021

Boris Borisovich BODENKO

1974

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

05/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 11.35 p.m. on 02/02/2021, brought to the police station at 00.50 a.m. on 03/02/2021, released at 04.55 a.m. on 03/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

4345/22

30/12/2021

Dmitriy Yaroslavovich GULEY

1978

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

 

 

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

09/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.  

4349/22

30/12/2021

Denis Bolotbekovich TABALDYYEV

1979

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

01/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 2.30 p.m., brought to the police station at 4.30 p.m. on the same day, released at 2 a.m. on 01/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

4563/22

17/12/2021

Yevgeniy Vladimirovich ABRAMENKOV

1988

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

29/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 11.20 p.m. on 02/02/2021, brought to the police station at 1 a.m. on 03/02/2021, released at 6 a.m. on the same day),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

4574/22

17/12/2021

Arina Yuryevna ONISHCHENKO

2001

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

17/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 23.59 on 02/02/2021, brought to the police station at 00.50 a.m. on 03/02/2021, released at 8.30 a.m. on the same day),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

4,000

  1.  

4576/22

17/12/2021

Artem Aleksandrovich YELIZAROV

2000

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

21/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 6.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021, brought to the police station at 7.40 p.m., released at 00.30 a.m. on 24/01/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

7715/22

13/01/2022

Vladimir Aleksandrovich DEVICHENKO

2002

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Orel

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Orel Regional Court

30/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and his subsequent conviction (raised on appeal)

5,000

  1.  

7720/22

13/01/2022

Tatyana Petrovna ZHURAVSKAYA

1976

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

21/04/2021

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

27/09/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

3,500

  1.  

7723/22

13/01/2022

Zhambal Balzhinimayevich GOMBOYEV

1975

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

27/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 11.15 a.m. on 02/02/2021, brought to the police station at 00.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021, released at 5 a.m. on 03/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

7774/22

13/01/2022

Irina Yuryevna ZUBAREVA

1990

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Kaliningrad

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Kaliningrad Regional Court

13/07/2021

Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction (raised on appeal)

5,000

  1.  

7777/22

13/01/2022

Nataliya Sergeyevna PIROZHKOVA

1999

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Ryazan

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Ryazan Regional Court

14/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021, brought to the police station at 1.50 p.m., brought before the court directly from the police station at midnight on 01/02/2021),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

 

 

 

4,000

  1.  

23619/22

28/03/2022

Nataliya Mikhaylovna KAPRANOVA

1959

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

11/11/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction (raised on appeal)

5,000

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/220.html