 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> POGORELOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 44147/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 266 (28 March 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/266.html Cite as: [2024] ECHR 266 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF POGORELOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 44147/21 and 27 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
28 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Pogorelova and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
30/08/2021 | Yuliya Aleksandrovna POGORELOVA 1994 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Tambov
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 6 days | Tambov Regional Court 01/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 1:20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 4:40 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
11/08/2021 | Andrey Aleksandrovich RUMYANTSEV 1994 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 12 days | Moscow City Court 11/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 11:20 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 7:00 p.m. on 03/03/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
17/08/2021 | Aleksandr Alekseyevich PUSHIN 1996 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 (received by the applicant on 02/06/2021) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 10:30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 4:30 p.m. on 03/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
27/08/2021 | Alisher Khakimbekovich BEKNAZAROV 1985 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 3:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12:35 p.m. on 02/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
27/08/2021 | Lev Borisovich NIKOLSKIY 1998 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9:50 a.m. om 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
27/08/2021 | Veniamin Sergeyevich ORLYANSKIY 1981 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | Moscow City Court 30/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9:15 a.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
25/07/2021 | Pavel Grigoryevich YAKUSHIN 1995 | Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 6 days | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and the morning of 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
12/08/2021 | Kirill Vladimirovich ALESHIN 1994 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 12 days | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1:15 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 2:30 p.m. on 02/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
| 5,000 | |
12/08/2021 | Darya Andreyevna ZIMINA 1996 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 15 days | Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 11:05 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 7:00 p.m. on 03/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
12/08/2021 | Nikita Sergeyevich KARPENKO 1995 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5:00 p.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
30/08/2021 | Dmitriy Gennadyevich NAUMOV 1987 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9:00 a.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
11/08/2021 | Yegor Aleksandrovich IVANOV 2002 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 28/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
11/08/2021 | Aleksey Leonidovich BRAYNIN 1973 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 14/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record; and detention at the police station between 3:45 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 2:00 p.m. on 24/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification. | 5,000 | |
11/08/2021 | Tatyana Yuryevna SOKOLOVSKAYA 1975 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 14/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 3:45 p.m. and 9:21 p.m. on 23/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification | 4,000 | |
27/08/2021 | Ivan Alekseyevich LAGASHIN 1991 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/03/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 0:26 and 9:25 a.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
27/08/2021 | Alena Aleksandrovna PAVLOVA 2001 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | Moscow City Court 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11:47 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and noon on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
07/08/2021 | Kirilla Igorevna LABINTATLO 1993 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 11:30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 7:00 p.m. on 03/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
07/08/2021 | Dmitriy Borisovich RUMSHINSKIY 1970 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 8 days | Moscow City Court 26/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the and detention at the police station between 2:48 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12:45 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
07/09/2021 | Lyudmila Ruslanovna PCHELKINA 1991 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 1:50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 7:50 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
02/09/2021 | Aleksey Andreyevich GUNYASHOV 1992 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St. Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 1:50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 3:10 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
07/09/2021 | Viktor Vasilyevich TIM 1997 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Tula
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 14,000 | Tula Regional Court 29/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 12:20 p.m. and 5:20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
05/05/2022 | Sabina Umirgaliyevna ZHOLTAYEVA 2002 | Kabirov Rushan Rafisovich Kazan | Anti-war rally
Kazan
27/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | detention for 3 days | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 5:31 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022, when the applicant was taken to court for a hearing of her case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
12/05/2022 | Zhanna Andreyevna OSIPOVA 1999 | Ibragimov Rushan Zubairovich Astrakhan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 13/12/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
15/07/2022 | Aleksandr Vasilyevich MILEV 1956 | Mangileva Vera Borisovna Yekaterinburg | Anti-war rally
Yekaterinburg
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | detention for 9 days | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 02/03/2022 (received by the applicant on 21/03/2021) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and the evening of 25/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
12/08/2022 | Andrey Leonidovich GRINGAUZ 1977 | Kuroptev Aleksey Mikhaylovich Balashikha | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 9 days | St Petersburg City Court 14/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 5:20 p.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 4,000 | |
08/08/2022 | Timur Olegovich ZAVGORODNIY 1990 | Dadayeva Yekaterina Viktorovna St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
02/04/2022 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | St Petersburg City Court 08/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3:45 p.m. on 02/04/2022 and 12:30 p.m. on 03/04/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
11/08/2022 | Pavel Viktorovich KHOLKIN 1969 | Kapustin Vladimir Yakovlevich Yekaterinburg | Anti-war rally
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 01/06/2022 |
| 3,500 | |
12/09/2022 | Sofya Olegovna LEN 1998 | Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d'Anjou | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
02/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 24/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 7:40 p.m. on 02/03/2022 and evening of 03/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.