LEVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 40953/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 385 (25 April 2024)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> LEVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 40953/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 385 (25 April 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/385.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 385

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF LEVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 40953/21 and 18 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

25 April 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Levanov and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Peeter Roosma, President,
 Ioannis Ktistakis,
 Andreas Zünd, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.


10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events;  and Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016, concerning disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 12-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 April 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal offence

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under

well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

40953/21

23/07/2021

Aleksandr Anatolyevich LEVANOV

1986

Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich

Chelyabinsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Chelyabinsk

 

23/01/2021

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

detention for 13 days

Chelyabinsk Regional Court

27/01/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.45 p.m. to 11.40 p.m. on 23/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings (in connection with events of 23/01/2021 and 02/03/2022),

 

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - 02/03/2022 / conviction for a call to participate in an anti-war rally posted on a social network / Article 20.3.3. § 2 / fine of RUB 90,000 / final decision on 07/07/2022 by the Chelyabinsk Regional Court

6,000

  1.    

41629/21

30/07/2021

Kristina Dzhonson RAMIRES

1990

Levenberg Yeva Viktorovna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 7 days

Moscow City Court

04/02/2021

Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - 23/01/2021 /solo demonstration in support of A. Navalnyy / Moscow/ Article 20.2. § 5 / fine of RUB 10,000 / final decision on 06/04/2021 by the Moscow City Court;

 

25/02/2021 /solo demonstration in support of A. Navalnyy / Article 20.2. § 8 / fine of RUB 150,000 / 26/02/2021 Tverskoy District Court of Moscow / final decision on 09/07/2021 by the Moscow City Court,

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 9:00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 2:30 a.m. on 24/01/2021; between 12:25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 11:00 a.m. on 01/01/2021;

and between 10:30 p.m. on 25/02/2021 and 5:15 p.m. on 26/02/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in all three sets of administrative proceedings (in connection with events of 23/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 and 25/02/2021)

7,000

  1.    

42393/21

06/08/2021

Sergey Vladimirovich TOLMACHEV

1979

Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich

Chelyabinsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Chelyabinsk

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

detention for 11 days

Chelyabinsk Regional Court

08/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 27/02/2021 for compiling an offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

5,000

  1.    

58082/21

11/11/2021

Sergey Mikhaylovich FILENKO

1970

Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich

Saint-Barthélemy-d'Anjou

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Petrozavodsk

 

23/01/2021

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Petrozavodsk

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 5,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia

11/05/2021

 

 

 

Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia

09/09/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - 24/02/2022, 03/03/2022, and 15/03/2022 / anti-war posts in the "Vkontakte" social network / Article 20.3.3 § 1 of the CAO / 20/04/2022 Petrozavodsk City Court / fine of RUB 30,000 (upheld by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia on 31/08/2022).

4,000

  1.    

9493/22

01/02/2022

Kristina Borisovna ISAYEVA

1989

Prosvirkina Kseniya Dmitriyevna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Belgorod

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Belgorod Regional Court

02/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.    

14155/22

18/02/2022

Mariya Yuryevna ANTYUSHEVA

1984

Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich

Krasnoyarsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

19/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 31/01/2021

4,000

  1.    

14828/22

27/02/2022

Aleksey Aleksandrovich BAVYKIN

1976

Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich

Voronezh

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

31/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 7:30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 1:10 a.m. on 22/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

 

4,000

  1.    

14843/22

27/02/2022

Nikita Nikolayevich KABAKOV

1999

Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich

Voronezh

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

30/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between on 31/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

17399/22

20/03/2022

Kseniya Sergeyevna MAYOROVA

2001

Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna

St Petersburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

St Petersburg City Court

21/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 5:00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021,

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

17807/22

12/03/2022

Daniel Vladimirovich CHERKASHIN

1998

Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich

Voronezh

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

21/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 23/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

25175/22

22/04/2022

Aleksey Pavlovich MERKULOV

1990

Sirosh Fedor Yevgenyevich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

21/04/2021

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

11/11/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

 

3,500

  1.  

37796/22

22/07/2022

Olga Andreyevna KOROBITSINA

2003

Pilipenko Anastasiya Vladimirovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

26/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3:10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and the morning of 07/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

38208/22

18/07/2022

Aleksandr Sergeyevich ABRAMOV

1996

Levichev Dmitriy Sergeyevich

Krasnoyarsk

Anti-war protest

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

27/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. on 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

39195/22

03/08/2022

Vladimir Mikhaylovich TOBOROVETS

1970

 

 

Anti-war protest

 

Voronezh

 

24/02/2022

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

80 hours of community work

Voronezh Regional Court

06/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:10 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 10:00 a.m. on 26/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

5,000

  1.  

41207/22

05/08/2022

Nadezhda Nikolayevna STEPANENKO

2002

Zaytsev Roman Olegovich

Volgograd

Anti-war rally

 

Volgograd

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Volgograd Regional Court

05/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:50 p.m. and the evening of 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

41334/22

12/08/2022

Svetlana Petrovna SEMENYUK

1970

 

 

Anti-war protest

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

11/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

41342/22

12/08/2022

Mikhail Dmitriyevich MILITSIN

1999

Zaytsev Roman Olegovich

Volgograd

Anti-war protest

 

Volgograd

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Volgograd Regional Court

13/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:50 p.m. and the evening of 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

43109/22

16/08/2022

Marek PASIERB

1984

 

 

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

 

25/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

19/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:45 p.m. on 25/02/2022 and the afternoon of 26/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

30089/23

12/03/2022

Artem Aleksandrovich SHCHELOKOV

1988

Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich

Voronezh

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

16/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 7:30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 1:10 a.m. on 22/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

4,000

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/385.html