BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Jean Reynier and Piero Erba v Commission of the EEC. [1963] EUECJ C-98/63 (13 November 1963)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1963/C9863.html
Cite as: [1963] EUECJ C-98/63

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
   

61963O0098
Order of the President of the Court of 13 November 1963.
Jean Reynier and Piero Erba v Commission of the European Economic Community.
Joined cases 98-63 and 99-63 R.
European Court reports
French edition 1964 Page 00553
Dutch edition 1964 Page 00561
German edition 1964 Page 00603
Italian edition 1964 Page 00547
English special edition 1964 Page 00276

 
   






++++
IN JOINED CASES 98/63 R AND 99/63 R
PIERO ERBA, OFFICIAL OF THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY,
AND
JEAN REYNIER, OFFICIAL OF THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY,
REPRESENTED AND ASSISTED BY M . SLUSNY, ADVOCATE AT THE COUR D'APPEL, BRUSSELS, AND HEAD OF DEPARTMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF E . ARENDT, AVOCAT-AVOUE, 6 RUE WILLY-GOERGEN, APPLICANTS,
V
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY DEFENDANT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER, LOUIS DE LA FONTAINE, APPOINTED AGENT FOR THIS PURPOSE BY THE COMMISSION, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE AT THE OFFICES OF HENRI MANZANARES, SECRETARY OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE EUROPEAN EXECUTIVES, 2 PLACE DE METZ, LUXEMBOURG,



APPLICATION TO SUSPEND THE OPERATION OF THE MEASURE CONTESTED IN THE MAIN ACTION,



WHEREAS THE APPLICATIONS FOR SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE SAID MEASURE ARE MOTIVATED BY THE FEAR THAT THE DEFENDANT COMMISSION, IN THE EVENT OF THE COURT'S DECLARING THAT THE APPLICATIONS IN CASES 79/63 AND 82/63, BROUGHT BY THE SAME APPLICANTS, ARE WELL - FOUNDED AND CONFIRMING THAT MESSRS ERBA AND REYNIER ARE ENTITLED TO BE CLASSIFIED IN GRADE A 3 WITH EFFECT FROM 1 JANUARY 1962, MIGHT EVADE ITS OBLIGATIONS BY CLAIMING THAT IT NO LONGER HAS ANY VACANT POSTS IN GRADE A 3 IN THE DETAILED LIST OF POSTS MENTIONED IN ARTICLE 6 OF THE EEC STAFF REGULATIONS;
WHEREAS TO AVOID THIS DANGER, THE APPLICANTS REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION BE ORDERED TO REFRAIN FROM FILLING THE GRADE A 3 POST FOR WHICH THE COMPETITION IS BEING HELD;
WHEREAS THE DEFENDANT'S REPRESENTATIVE STATED DURING THE HEARING THAT IF THE COURT DECLARES THE APPLICATIONS IN CASES 79/63 AND 82/63 WELL-FOUNDED, THE COMMISSION WILL GIVE EFFECT TO THE JUDGMENT AND CLASSIFY THE APPLICANTS IN GRADE A 3 WITH EFFECT FROM 1 JANUARY 1962;
WHEREAS THIS CLEAR AND UNEQUIVOCAL STATEMENT SATISFIES THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMMISSION UNDER ARTICLE 176 OF THE TREATY;
WHEREAS IT IS FOR THE COMMISSION ITSELF TO DECIDE THE MANNER IN WHICH IT WILL GIVE EFFECT TO THE JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT, AND THERE IS NO NEED TO LAY DOWN IN ADVANCE BY MEANS OF AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER THE METHODS FOR GIVING EFFECT TO THE JUDGMENT;
WHEREAS, MOREOVER, THE ABOVE-MENTIONED STATEMENT CONFIRMS THAT TO CARRY OUT THE COMPETITION PROCEDURE WILL NOT PREJUDICE THE APPLICANTS AS REGARDS THEIR APPLICATIONS IN CASES 79/63 AND 82/63 SO THAT IN THIS RESPECT THEIR REQUESTS FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE MEASURE ARE DIVESTED OF ALL LEGAL INTEREST;
WHEREAS, FURTHERMORE, IN THESE APPLICATIONS FOR SUSPENSION OF THE SAID MEASURE, THE APPLICANTS ALLEGE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR REQUESTS THAT THERE ARE IRREGULARITIES IN THE COMPETITION PROCEDURE AS PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSION AND THEY ALSO RELY ON THESE IRREGULARITIES IN THEIR CLAIMS;
WHEREAS, HOWEVER, THE ALLEGATIONS WHICH THEY MAKE CONCERNING THESE ARE EXTREMELY GENERAL IN NATURE, AND SINCE AN EXAMINATION OF THEM WOULD INVOLVE FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL PRINCIPLES, IT CANNOT BE CARRIED OUT IN THE CONTEXT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE;
WHEREAS, LASTLY, IT IS NOT DISPUTED IN THIS MATTER THAT THE APPLICANTS DID NOT ENTER THE COMPETITION MENTIONED ABOVE AND CONSEQUENTLY THE ALLEGED IRREGULARITIES ARE NOT SUCH AS MAY CAUSE THEM DIRECT AND PERSONAL DAMAGE;
WHEREAS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES THERE IS NO GROUND FOR GRANTING THE SUSPENSION REQUESTED;



THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER .
1 . THE APPLICATIONS ARE DISMISSED;
2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .

 
  © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1963/C9863.html