B2/01/1170
Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 1763
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE     
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE CROYDON COUNTY COURT
(HIS HONOUR JUDGE T A C CONINGSBY QC)

								Royal Courts of Justice
								Strand
								London WC2A 2LL

								Thursday 8 November 2001

B e f o r e:

LORD JUSTICE BUXTON

- - - - - -

EZEKIEL ALPHOUS PINNOCK
Claimant/Applicant

- v -

CROYDON CHURCH HOUSING ASSOCIATION
Defendant/Respondent

- - - - - -

(Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited, 190 Fleet Street,
London EC4A 2AG
Tel: 020 7421 4040  Fax: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

- - - - - -
There was no attendance or representation.

- - - - - -

J U D G M E N T
1.	LORD JUSTICE BUXTON: In this renewed application, there is no appearance by Mr Pinnock. He has given no indication to the court of any reason why he is either delayed or not able to attend. In those circumstances, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution subject to this condition. When this order is drawn, a copy of it will be sent by first‑class post to Mr Pinnock. The order will thereafter not pass the seal for 7 days after the date of dispatch to Mr Pinnock, during which time he may apply to the court in writing to indicate reasons why the matter should be reinstated. That will be contained in the order. 
2.	I will add as part of my judgment that Mr Pinnock will have to produce very cogent reasons why the matter should be reinstated. It will not be enough for him simply to make formal application. 
Order: Application dismissed for want of prosecution.