 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Revitt & Ors v Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] EWHC 2074 (Admin) (17 July 2006) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/2074.html Cite as: [2006] EWHC 2074 (Admin) |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
The Strand London WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
(Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers)
and
MR JUSTICE CRESSWELL
____________________
| (1) ASHLEY JOSEPH REVITT | ||
| (2) LEE MICHAEL BORG | ||
| (3) ARRON BARNES | ||
| Appellants | ||
| - v - | ||
| DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS | ||
| Respondent |
____________________
Smith Bernal, 190 Fleet Street, London EC4
Telephone No: 020 7421 4040
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Stafford) appeared on behalf of THE THREE APPELLANTS
THE RESPONDENT was not represented
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Monday 17 July 2006
THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: Mr Davis, we think the appropriate course is to adjourn this appeal so that the Crown Prosecution Service can be represented to deal with the issues of principle that arise. In particular, if it is to be said that a point is reached at which someone charged with a criminal offence has been proved guilty according to law at a stage prior to the conclusion of the proceedings, what are the principles that apply so as to satisfy that test?
MR DAVIS: My Lord, yes. I would be very grateful to be able to expand on the skeleton argument to address that issue.
THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: Yes. We will see if we can get this brought back this term, but it may be difficult. But we will adjourn on that basis.