BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Nursing And Midwifery Council v Faulds [2012] EWHC 2729 (Admin) (22 August 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/2729.html
Cite as: [2012] EWHC 2729 (Admin)

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2729 (Admin)
Case No. CO/8266/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
22 August 2012

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE KENNETH PARKER
____________________

Between:
NURSING AND MIDWIFERY COUNCIL Applicant
v
FAULDS Respondent

____________________

Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

Ms J Dirmikis (instructed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council) appeared on behalf of the Applicant
The Respondent did not attend and was not represented

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. MR JUSTICE KENNETH PARKER: This is an application made by the Nursing and Midwifery Council to extend an interim suspension order until 1 March 2013. The original order was imposed on 2 March 2011 for 18 months and it would otherwise expire on 1 September 2012.
  2. The facts have been set out in a helpful skeleton argument prepared by Miss Joanna Dirmikis for the Nursing and Midwifery Council. I have read that. I have read the witness statement and the exhibits. It appears to me that this is a case that has been moving with reasonable expedition and the forward projection also appears to me to be one that is reasonable and acceptable.
  3. It is unnecessary to recite in public the factual allegations that are made against the respondent. It is sufficient to say that they are of a serious nature and would obviously call in question the fitness of the respondent to practise. Therefore it appears to me that it is in the public interest that the interim suspension order be extended for the period until 1 March 2013, and I make that order accordingly.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/2729.html