BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Full Circle Asset Management Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Financial Ombudsman Service [2014] EWHC 1440 (Admin) (14 March 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2014/1440.html
Cite as: [2014] EWHC 1440 (Admin)

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 1440 (Admin)
Case No. CO/13079/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
14 March 2014

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE LEWIS
____________________

Between:
THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF
FULL CIRCLE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED Claimant
v
FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE Defendant

____________________

Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

Mr Rory Phillips QC and Mr Robert Purves (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain) appeared on behalf of the Claimant
Jonathan Moffett (instructed by the Financial Ombudsman) appeared on behalf of the Defendant

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

    MR JUSTICE LEWIS:

  1. In my judgment, this is a case that does deserve to be argued out fully. There are the practical considerations about the operation of the scheme as a whole that Mr Phillips QC raises on behalf the claimant. In addition, there is the wording of section 228. It says:
  2. "A complaint is to be determined by reference to what is, in the opinion of the ombudsman, fair and reasonable in all the circumstances of the case."

    That does raise issues as to what that means and whether the opinion of the ombudsman is what is fair and reasonable against a background where the industry has accepted a particular level of risk being characterised as medium or not, or whether there is some other reading to be given to the provision.

  3. I take on board Mr Moffett's powerful and pithy points that the words "will take into account" mean "will take into account" the industry views and it can depart from them. Against that, Mr Phillips QC says "take into account" all depends upon the context, and when you are dealing with the regulatory standard, if that is what it is, you have to take that into account and you cannot substitute your view on what is the appropriate standard because you think that is fair and reasonable.
  4. Although it is a short point, it does seem to me that it is both potentially complex and important, so I am therefore persuaded that this is a case where permission should be granted.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2014/1440.html