BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Irish Competition Authority Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Competition Authority Decisions >> Navenby/Savage Plastic Packaging Ltd/Savpack/Noel Savage [1993] IECA 35 (24th September, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/35.html
Cite as: [1993] IECA 35

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Navenby/Savage Plastic Packaging Ltd/Savpack/Noel Savage [1993] IECA 35 (24th September, 1993)

Notification No. CA/864/92E - Navenby Limited/Savage Plastic Packaging Limited/Savpak Limited/Noel Savage and others

Decision No. 35

Introduction

1. An agreement between Navenby Limited (Navenby) and Noel Savage, Kevin Savage, Christopher Kiernan, and Industrial Credit Corporation (the vendors) containing a non-compete clause pursuant to the sale of the entire issued share capital of Savage Plastic Packaging Limited (Savage) and Savpak Limited (Savpak) was notified to the Competition Authority on 30 September 1992. The notification requested a certificate or, in the event of a certificate being refused, a licence.

The Facts

(a) The Subject of the Notification

2. The notification relates to an agreement dated 28 April 1989 between the vendors and Navenby whereby the vendors agree to sell the entire issued share capital of Savage and Savpak to Navenby. The agreement also contains a non-compete provision.

(b) The Parties

3. Savage and Savpak are limited companies incorporated in the State. Prior to its sale, the vendors had a 100% interest in both companies. Navenby is a limited company with registered offices at 41-45 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2. As part of the sale agreement, the vendors have received shares in Navenby by way of consideration for the sale of Savage and Savpak.

(c) The Arrangements

4. The notification relates to an agreement, dated 28 April 1989, for the sale of the entire share capital of Savage and Savpak to Navenby. The agreement contained a non-compete clause which prevented the vendors from becoming involved in any business which competed with those sold for a period of two years from the date of completion. This period expired on 28 April 1991.

Assessment

(a) Section 4(1)

5. Section 4(1) of the Competition Act states that 'all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are prohibited and void'.

(b) The Undertakings and the Agreement

6. Section 3(1) of the Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person being an individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a service.' The parties to the present agreement are the vendors and Navenby. Navenby is limited company with registered offices in Dublin. It is engaged for gain through its interest in Savage and Savpak, both of which are engaged for gain in the packaging business. Prior to completion of the agreement, the vendors were the beneficial owners of the companies and were therefore undertakings within the meaning of the Act at the time of the agreement. This is consistent with the Authority's decisions in ACT/Kindle and Scully/Tyrrell.

(c) Applicability of Section 4(1)

7. As the sale of business was completed prior to 1 October, 1991, the date on which the Competition Act came into force, this element of the agreement had been discharged by performance before the Act commenced. The property which was the subject of the agreement had been transferred. In the Authority's view, the prohibition in Section 4(1) only applies to a current or continuing contractual commitment or one entered into subsequent to the coming into force of the Act. As the merger or sale element of the 1991 transaction was discharged prior to the commencement of the Act, that aspect of the arrangements does not come within the scope of Section 4(1).

8. The non-compete clause had also expired before the Act came into force. Thus, in the Authority's view, there was not an agreement between undertakings in existence at, or since, the time the Act came into force. The notification is therefore invalid and the Authority is unable to grant a certificate or licence.

The Decision

9. In the Authority's opinion, Navenby Limited, Noel Savage, Kevin Savage, Christopher Kiernan, and Industrial Credit Corporation are undertakings within the meaning of Section 3(1) of the Competition Act. As the entire agreement had expired before 1 October 1991, the notified arrangements do not constitute an agreement which was in existence at the time, or since, the Act came into force; it cannot be validly notified under Section 7(1) or 7(2) of the Competition Act and the Authority cannot issue a certificate or licence in respect of the notification.

For the Competition Authority


Patrick Massey
Member
24 September 1993


© 1993 Irish Competition Authority


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/35.html