2487_12IT Turley v Department for Employment and ... [2013] NIIT 02487_12IT (25 March 2013)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Turley v Department for Employment and ... [2013] NIIT 02487_12IT (25 March 2013)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2013/2487_12IT.html
Cite as: [2013] NIIT 2487_12IT, [2013] NIIT 02487_12IT

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

 

CASE REF:   2487/12

 

 

 

CLAIMANT:                      Christina Turley

 

 

RESPONDENT:                Department for Employment and Learning

 

 

 

DECISION

Pursuant to Article 205 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (“The Order”), I have decided that the liability of Global Armour Ltd to the claimant in respect of a redundancy payment has not been extinguished because of time-limit issues  In particular, I have decided that it is just and equitable that the claimant should receive a redundancy payment even though she did not take none of the actions specified in paragraph (1) of Article 199 of the Order were taken within the time-limit which is specified in that paragraph.

 

Constitution of Tribunal:

Chairman (Sitting alone):           Mr P Buggy

 

Appearances:

The claimant was self-represented.

 

 

 The Department was represented by Mr N Cruikshanks.

 

 

REASONS

1.               My understanding is that the only thing preventing the Department from making payment to the claimant, in respect of redundancy, is the time-limit issue.  This hearing was originally intended to be a Case Management Discussion.  However, at my suggestion, both parties agreed that it could be turned into a Pre-Hearing Review, which would address the time-limit issue.

 

 

2.               I am satisfied that it is just and equitable that the claimant should receive a redundancy payment, despite the time-limit omissions, mainly for the following reasons.  First, nobody has been prejudiced by the delay.  Secondly, the delay period is short.

 

 

 

 

Chairman:

 

 

Date and place of hearing:         19 February 2013, Belfast.        

 

 

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2013/2487_12IT.html