THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

CASE REF: 204/15

CLAIMANT:	Sharon Crooks

RESPONDENTS:	  1. Liam Wilson
			  2. Anise Trading Limited
			  3. Shek Hair Group

DECISION

(A)	The claimant’s holiday pay claim against Anise Trading Ltd (“Anise”) is well-founded and it is ordered that Anise shall pay to the claimant the sum of £57        in respect of holiday pay.

(B)	The claimant’s claim for notice pay against Anise is well-founded and it is ordered that Anise shall pay to the claimant the sum of £600 in respect of notice pay.

(C)	The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against Anise is well-founded and it is declared that Anise is liable to make a redundancy payment of £2,125 to the claimant.

(D)	The claimant’s claims against the other respondents are not well-founded and accordingly those claims are dismissed.

Constitution of the Tribunal:

Employment Judge (sitting alone): Employment Judge Buggy	

Appearances:

The claimant was self-represented.

The respondents did not appear and were not represented.

				

CASE REF: 204/15

REASONS

1.	I announced my decision at the end of the hearing.  At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.

2.	This Decision is based on the following information:

Gross weekly pay: £170

Net weekly pay: £150

Number of deemed completed years of service: 15

Age on date of dismissal: 32

Multiplier (for redundancy pay): 12.5

3.	This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990. 

Employment Judge: _________________________

Date and place of hearing: 26th March 2015, Belfast

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: