BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Agnes Craig v Richartson. [1610] Mor 16829 (27 June 1610)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor3816829-035.html
Cite as: [1610] Mor 16829

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1610] Mor 16829      
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. II.

Deeds signed by Notaries.

Agnes Craig
 v.
Richartson

Date: 27 June 1610
Case No. No. 35.

The same notary cannot subscribe for both parties in a contract.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A woman having given reversion being pursued for redemption, and all others having interest, that will be restricted by the Lords' declaration, to all others having interest from her allenarly, and to no others. A writ of consequence is not lawful, unless it be subscribed by the party or two notaries, if the party cannot write. It is not to be allowed that a notary shall subscribe for both the parties in a contract.

 Haddington, No. 1925.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor3816829-035.html