BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1611] Mor 12448 (16 January 1611)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1611/Mor2912448-275.html
Cite as: [1611] Mor 12448

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1611] Mor 12448      
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. XV.

Other allegeances, how relevant to be proved.

A
 v.
B

Date: 16 January 1611
Case No. No 275.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Albeit a man pursuing a notary for extracting and delivering to him of an instrument, alleged concerning the pursuer, and taken in that notary's hand, can have no other probation than the notary's oath and his book; yet, if an act or instrument be taken in Court, the Lords inclined to think that it might be proved per membra curiæ, as the Judges, remanent clerks, and procurators, who were also famous, and more famous than the clerks.

 Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 234. Haddington, MS. No 2091.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1611/Mor2912448-275.html