You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Little v Earl of Nithsdale. [1665] Mor 6692 (20 January 1665)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor1606692-118.html Cite as:
[1665] Mor 6692
In what cases Extracts sustained to satisfy production. - When condescendence of the writs called for is sufficient. - Transumpts.
Little v. Earl of Nithsdale
Date: 20 January 1665 Case No. No 118.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Writs registered in the Court of Session being called for, a condescendence of the dates of registration was sustained to bar certification, because that was equivalent to saying, that the writs called for are already in the hands of the Clerks of Court, which, of course, must satisfy the production.
