BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Forbes v Dunbar, [1726] Mor 11014 (00 February 1726)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1726/Mor2611014-215.html
Cite as: [1726] Mor 11014

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1726] Mor 11014      
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION VII.

Septennial Prescription of Cautionary Obligations, by act 5th Parl. 1695.
Subject_3 SECT. II.

Who entitled to the benefit of the act 1695. - Can the benefit of it be renounced.

Forbes
 v.
Dunbar,

1726. February.
Case No. No 215.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

It was found, that action for relief competent to one cautioner against another, is not cut off by the septennial prescription, but runs the course of 40 years. See Appendix.

 Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 119.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1726/Mor2611014-215.html