M'Dougal v M'Dougal. [1739] Mor 11273 (30 November 1739)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Dougal v M'Dougal. [1739] Mor 11273 (30 November 1739)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Mor2711273-441.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1739] Mor 11273

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION XV.
Interruption of the Negative Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. I.
What diligence sufficient. - Effect of partial interruption.

M'Dougal
v.
M'Dougal

Date: 30 November 1739
Case No. No 441.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A Summons executed interrupts prescription, though it never be called, for it is the citation itself that interrupts: So the laws suppose that appoint citations for interruption to be registered. But it was here found, that a citation on a blank summons, which, till of late was in use, was no interruption.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 112. Kilkeran, (Prescription.) No 4. p. 41.5.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Mor2711273-441.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Dougal v M'Dougal. [1739] Mor 11273 (30 November 1739) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Mor2711273-441.html