BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1752] Mor 8345 (28 February 1752)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1752/Mor2008345-026.html
Cite as: [1752] Mor 8345

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1752] Mor 8345      

Subject_1 LITIGIOUS.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Litigious by Process.
Subject_3 SECT. II.

Can Executions be Amended after being produced in Process? - Executions of Legal Diligence after Registration.

A
v.
B

Date: 28 February 1752
Case No. No 26.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

This day an Ordinary verbally reported this point, whether where an execution of removing bore two witnesses to the executing at the church-door, the messenger could be allowed, after improbation was proponed, to amend his execution, by adding other two witnesses to his execution.

The Lords were of opinion he could not.

It was thought pretty evident, that he had averred a falsehood, in inserting the two that were in the execution, and that this was not so properly amending as making a new one.

Kilkerran, (Execution.) No 3. p. 170.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1752/Mor2008345-026.html