Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> #name [1776] 5 Brn 617 (00 December 1776)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Brn050617-0749.html
Cite as: [1776] 5 Brn 617
|
|
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> #name [1776] 5 Brn 617 (00 December 1776) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Brn050617-0749.html Cite as: [1776] 5 Brn 617 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1776] 5 Brn 617
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
1776 .December Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A Debtor having presented a bill of suspension, to which answers were given in, followed by replies and duplies, the bill was past upon caution; but no caution being found within the time limited by Acts of Sederunt, the debtor was apprehended by a messenger. While in custody, before actual incarceration, he presented a new suspension, and obtained a sist; notwithstanding whereof, having been incarcerated, he presented a complaint, setting forth, Primo, The illegality of incarcerating him after a bill of suspension past, without a certificate from the Bill-Chamber that no caution was found; and, secundo, This illegality increased after a sist on a new bill of suspension obtained and intimated. But the Lords rejected the complaint unanimously. They held that a certificate, such as mentioned, was proper, but not necessary; and they held that a sist on a bill of suspension, intimated after apprehension, did not stop incarceration.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting