United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments

 

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: EA/02759/2016

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House	Decision & Reasons Promulgated
On 23 rd March 2018	On 26 th April 2018

 

 

Before

 

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ZUCKER

 

Between

 

MR ISSIFU SEIDU

(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)

Appellant

 

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

 

For the Appellant: Ms Ofei-Kwatia, Counsel instructed by BWF Solicitors

For the Respondent: Ms Z Ahmad, Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.              The Appellant is a citizen of Ghana whose date of birth is recorded as 4 ^th August 1985. He made application for a residence card pursuant to the EEA Regulations 2006 on the basis of being an extended family member. On 23 ^rd February 2016 the Respondent refused the application and the Appellant appealed. On 31 ^st January 2017 Designated Judge of the First-tier Tribunal McCarthy sitting at Birmingham dismissed the appeal on the basis of the guidance in the case of Sala [2016] UKUT 411 in which the Upper Tribunal had held that there was no basis upon which an application of this sort could succeed before the Tribunal. Subsequently, the Court of Appeal in the case of Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 1755 gave judgment to the effect that the reasoning in the case of Sala was wrong. Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was granted on that basis by Designated Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Woodcraft on 24 ^th January 2018.

2.              Ms Ahmad for the Secretary of State accepts that she cannot resist this appeal. She is right to take that position. Accordingly I find that there was a material error of law. I have to decide whether to remake or remit the decision. As there has been nothing material done by the Tribunal other than to have regard to the guidance in the case of Sala it is entirely appropriate for the matter to be remitted to resolve on the merits with findings of fact needing to be made with respect to the nature of the relationship contended for. In those circumstances the matter will be remitted to Birmingham First-tier Tribunal to be heard de novo.

Notice of Decision

3.              The decision of the First-tier Tribunal contained a material error of law and is set aside to be remade in the First-tier Tribunal.

 

No anonymity direction is made.

 

Signed Date: 23 April 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Zucker