BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA033442021 [2022] UKAITUR EA033442021 (9 November 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2022/EA033442021.html
Cite as: [2022] UKAITUR EA033442021, [2022] UKAITUR EA33442021

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Description: Description: Asylum and Immigration tribunal-b&w-tiff

 

Upper Tribunal

Appeal Number: UI-2022-002314

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

On appeal from EA/03344/2021

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

 

Heard at Bradford

On the 17 th October 2022

 

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

 

On the 09 th November 2022

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BRUCE

 

 

Between

 

Alex Oti Boateng

Appellant

And

 

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Respondent

 

 

For the Appellant: Mr Osei-Bonsu, Sponsor

For the Respondent: Mr Diwnycz, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

1.       The Appellant is a national of Ghana born on the 21 st June 1994. He appeals with permission against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Mills) to dismiss his appeal against a refusal to issue him with a family permit to enable him to join his sponsor (his cousin) in the United Kingdom.

2.       Judge Mills' decision was dated the 14 th January 2022. In short he did not accept that the Appellant and the Sponsor were related as claimed. Permission to appeal to this Tribunal was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Beach on the 22 nd April 2022; Judge Beach thought it arguable that in reaching his decision Judge Mills may have overlooked some material evidence. By her Rule 24 response dated the 31 st May 2022 the Respondent agreed that this ground was made out: she invites me to set the decision of Judge Mills aside and to remit the matter to the First-tier Tribunal so that it may be heard afresh.

3.       At the hearing before me the Sponsor Mr Osei-Bonsu indicated that the Appellant was in agreement with this course of action. I therefore set aside the decision of Judge Mills by consent and remit the matter to the First-tier Tribunal for hearing de novo.

 

Decisions and Directions

4.       The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside by consent.

5.       The decision in the appeal is to be remade in the First-tier Tribunal by a Judge other than Judge Mills.

 

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Bruce

17 th October 2022

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2022/EA033442021.html