BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA019202022 & EA019442022 [2023] UKAITUR EA019202022 (19 March 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/EA019202022.html
Cite as: [2023] UKAITUR EA19202022, [2023] UKAITUR EA019202022

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

 

Case Nos: UI- 2022-005191

UI-2022-005192

First-tier Tribunal No: EA/01920/2022

EA/01944/2022

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

 

Decision & Reasons Issued:

On the 19 March 2023

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BRUCE

 

 

Between

 

Leen Razouk

Ninar Razouk

(no anonymity order made)

Appellant

and

 

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

For the Appellants: No Appearance

For the Respondent: Mr McVeety, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

Heard at Manchester Civil Justice Centre on 10 January 2023

 

DECISION AND REASONS

1.               The Appellants are sisters, both nationals of Syria. They appeal with permission to this Tribunal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Swinnerton) to dismiss their linked appeals under the EU Settlement Scheme.

2.               By his decision of the 23 rd June 2022 Judge Swinnerton dismissed the appeals of the Appellants, and the linked appeal of their mother (Mrs Afamnya Mir Mahmod UI-2022-005190). Although the Judge accepted that the three were related as claimed to their UK based Sponsor, Mrs Zainab Almear Hussain, they had not demonstrated financial dependency upon her.

3.               Permission was granted on the 9 th October 2022 by First-tier Tribunal Judge Boyes, who observed that neither of these Appellants were required to demonstrate dependency. They were the direct descendants of Mrs Hussain, who is their maternal grandmother, and they are both under 21. That is sufficient. The Secretary of State accepts that this is the case, and before me, and by a Rule 24 response, Mr McVeety has indicated that he intends to have the decision to refuse entry clearance reversed, and a family permit issued.

4.               The appeals are therefore allowed by consent.

 

Decisions

5.               The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside.

6.               The appeals are allowed with reference to the EUSS.

7.               There is no order for anonymity.

 

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Bruce

Immigration and Asylum Chamber

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/EA019202022.html