Wood v Fylde Transport Ltd [1992] UKEAT 13_92_0812 (8 December 1992)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Wood v Fylde Transport Ltd [1992] UKEAT 13_92_0812 (8 December 1992)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1992/13_92_0812.html
Cite as: [1992] UKEAT 13_92_812, [1992] UKEAT 13_92_0812

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    BAILII case number: [1992] UKEAT 13_92_0812

    Appeal No. EAT/13/92

    EMPOLYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL

    58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS

    At the Tribunal

    On 8th December 1992

    Before

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE J HICKS QC

    MR R H PHIPPS

    MR P SMITH


    PETER RONALD WOOD          APPELLANT

    FYLDE TRANSPORT LIMITED          RESPONDENTS


    Transcript of Proceedings

    JUDGMENT

    PRELIMINARY HEARING

    Revised


     

    APPEARANCES

    For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE BY OR

    ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT


     

    JUDGE J HICKS QC: In the case of Mr Peter Wood v. Fylde Transport Limited, we dismiss the appeal. The Appellant has not attended nor is he represented; we can therefore deal with the matter fairly briefly.

    The Appellant was a bus driver employed by the Respondent, Fylde Transport Ltd, and he was dismissed after an allegation by the mother of a teenage passenger who had alleged that the Appellant assaulted her son. There was a conflict between that complaint and the Appellant's version in regard to some details, but he accepted that he had lifted the boy out of his seat by grabbing him by the jacket lapels.

    The Industrial Tribunal dealt in a full decision, their reasons extending to some 12 pages, with all the matters that were canvassed before them by the Appellant, who was represented, and it seems to us having, all of us, read those reasons that the Industrial Tribunal addressed all the matters which they should have addressed, that they applied the right tests to the decision they had to make and that there is no basis on which their decision can arguably be attacked. We therefore dismiss this appeal.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1992/13_92_0812.html