[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Marshall v Royal London Hospital Trust [1994] UKEAT 430_93_0605 (6 May 1994) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1994/430_93_0605.html Cite as: [1994] UKEAT 430_93_605, [1994] UKEAT 430_93_0605

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

BAILII case number: [1994] UKEAT 430_93_0605

Appeal No. EAT/430/93

EMPOLYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL

58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS

At the Tribunal

On 6 May 1994

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MORISON

MR J D DALY

MRS M E SUNDERLAND JP

---

MR E A MARSHALL          APPELLANT

THE ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL TRUST          RESPONDENTS

---

Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

Revised


 


---

APPEARANCES

For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE BY

OR REPRESENTATION

ON BEHALF OF THE

APPELLANT


 


MR JUSTICE MORISON: This is a Preliminary Hearing in the case of Mr E A Marshall and The Royal London Hospital Trust. He has made complaints of racial discrimination in relation to his employment and a number of matters were investigated by the Industrial Tribunal who entered their decision in the register on 23 April 1993 following a hearing which spanned 7 days.

It is our view that there are matters which can legitimately be argued on this appeal and accordingly we would allow this to go for a Full Hearing before the Employment Appeal Tribunal. That said, we think it would be of assistance to this Court were the Appellant to be represented because there are issues of law which may require to be investigated. We understand that mention has already been made of the possibility of him having a solicitor and in any event we would have thought that it might be appropriate, if those arrangements have not been put in hand by the Appellant, that he perhaps could seek the advice of the Commission for Racial Equality as to possible representation. We do not consider that the Notes of Evidence are required as at present advised.