BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Smith (t/a SB Management) v Maddox & Anor [1997] UKEAT 1274_96_1604 (16 April 1997)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1997/1274_96_1604.html
Cite as: [1997] UKEAT 1274_96_1604

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1997] UKEAT 1274_96_1604
Appeal No. EAT/1274/96

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 16 April 1997

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D M LEVY QC

MR T C THOMAS CBE

MS D WARWICK



A T SMITH T/A SB MANAGEMENT APPELLANT

(1) MR C MADDOX
(2) MRS C FULSTON
RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1997


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants NO APPEARANCE BY OR
    REPRESENTATION ON
    BEHALF OF THE
    APPELLANTS
       


     

    JUDGE D M LEVY QC: This is an appeal by Mr A.T. Smith trading as SB Management against a decision of the Industrial Tribunal held at London (South) on 16 September 1996.

    No one has attended on behalf of Mr Smith, who was the Respondent before the Industrial Tribunal, but having considered the documents, we are of the opinion that the appeal should be allowed to go ahead on one of the questions raised in the Notice of Appeal; that is, that there was no proper hearing by the Industrial Tribunal and we will give directions solely for the appeal to go forward on this point.

    Mr Smith has sworn an affidavit dated 7 November 1996, setting out the grounds on which he felt he was not given a fair or proper hearing and that the Chairman, by a letter dated 13 March 1997, has given his explanation. From the Chairman's letter it appears that the case was called on at 4 o'clock and concluded at 5.20 pm. Mr Smith's case is that he simply did not get a proper hearing.

    We direct that the Applicants below (the Respondents to this appeal) have liberty to lodge and serve an affidavit in reply to Mr Smith's affidavit if they so wish and they will be given 28 days so to respond. It will be right, after the response, if any, has been received that the Chairman and those who sat with him at the hearing should be given the opportunity to comment if they wish on such responses indeed the members who sat with the Chairman at the hearing should be entitled to send their comments to this Tribunal on all affidavit evidence served.

    After that period, the matter should come on for an inter partes hearing solely on this ground of appeal.

    The order will provide for cross-examination of any deponents to affidavits if that is required by the other side. A notice of such request should be given within six weeks of today.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1997/1274_96_1604.html