BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> TNT Express & Anor v Brown [1998] UKEAT 11_98_0602 (6 February 1998)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/11_98_0602.html
Cite as: [1998] UKEAT 11_98_602, [1998] UKEAT 11_98_0602

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1998] UKEAT 11_98_0602
Appeal No. EAT/11/98 EAT/225/98

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 6 February 1998

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK

MR A C BLYGHTON

MR R H PHIPPS



(1) TNT EXPRESS
(2) WORLDWIDE (UK) LTD
APPELLANTS

MR V BROWN RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1998


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants MR P NICHOLLS
    (of Counsel)
    Hewitson Becke & Shaw
    Shakespeare House
    42 Newmarket Road
    Cambridge
    CB5 8EP
       


     

    JUDGE PETER CLARK: We have before us two appeals brought by the employer, TNT Express Worldwide (UK) Ltd, against respectively a decision on liability and a decision on remedies reached by the Industrial Tribunal in this case. Having considered the outline submissions made by Mr Nicholls, on behalf of the Appellant employer, we are quite satisfied that these appeals raise arguable points of law fit to go to a full hearing.

    Accordingly, we give leave to the Appellant to argue these matters at a full hearing and we give the following consequential directions.

    First, that the two appeals, EAT/11/98 and EAT/225/98, be consolidated and heard together.

    Secondly, that the Appellant have leave to amend its grounds of appeal in terms of the draft lodged with the EAT.

    Thirdly, this case should be listed for one full day; Category B.

    Fourth, we direct that the amended grounds of appeal headed "Amended Notice of Appeal" be sent, in copy form, to the Tribunal Chairman for his comments on the matter raised in paragraph 3(iv) of the amended notice.

    Finally, we consider that it is essential that Mr Brown should have the benefit of legal representation at the full appeal hearing. He has attended today and tells us that he has already consulted a Solicitor. He is not currently in employment.

    In these circumstances we very much hope that, if an application is made on his behalf for legal aid, that the local committee will look favourably on that application, subject of course to an enquiry as to means. As a matter of merits, we have no doubt that this a proper case in which legal aid ought to be granted.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/11_98_0602.html