BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> American Golf Discount Centre Ltd v Williams [1998] UKEAT 778_98_0110 (1 October 1998)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/778_98_0110.html
Cite as: [1998] UKEAT 778_98_0110, [1998] UKEAT 778_98_110

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1998] UKEAT 778_98_0110
Appeal No. EAT/778/98

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 1 October 1998

Before

THE HONOURABLE LORD JOHNSTON

MR T C THOMAS CBE

MR G H WRIGHT MBE



AMERICAN GOLF DISCOUNT CENTRE LTD APPELLANT

MR M A WILLIAMS RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING - EX PARTE

© Copyright 1998


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants MISS M ANDERSON
    (Representative)
    Peninsula Business Services Ltd
    Stamford House
    361-365 Chapel Street
    Salford
    Manchester
    M5 5JY
       


     

    LORD JOHNSTON: This is the matter of American Golf Discount Centre Ltd against Mr M A Williams. In the preliminary hearing before us. Miss Anderson who appeared for the appellants submitted concisely, but to the point, that there was at least a question in this appeal with regard to the issue of whether or not the tribunal has substituted their view for that of the employer in determining how to categorise the conduct, to put a neutral phrase, that it was established to the satisfaction of the tribunal the respondent had committed.

    Without much hesitation, we are of the view, despite the fact that within the decision the tribunal are careful to remind themselves that they must not substitute their own view, there is, at very least, a real question as to whether that is not what they have done. In the circumstances, this appeal will be allowed to go forward upon the issue, and only upon the issue, of whether or not the tribunal erred on the basis of a substitution of their view for that of the employer in considering how the conduct complained of should be categorised.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/778_98_0110.html