BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Sullivan-Davies v. Space Enterprise Ltd [1999] UKEAT 560_99_2607 (26 July 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/560_99_2607.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 560_99_2607

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 560_99_2607
Appeal No. EAT/560/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 26 July 1999

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D M LEVY QC

MR P R A JACQUES CBE

PROFESSOR P D WICKENS OBE



MRS T SULLIVAN-DAVIES APPELLANT

SPACE ENTERPRISE LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR C GLIN
    (OF COUNSEL)
    (Instructed by)
    Messrs Irwin Mitchell Braby & Waller
    Solicitors
    48-50 St Johns Street
    London EC1M 4DP
       


     

    JUDGE D M LEVY QC: In this PHD, Mr Glyn appears for the Appellant. He was not responsible for the Notice of Appeal or the Skeleton Argument which was prepared for us for the morning. He has, in the course of his address, persuaded us that there is one point to go forward to a full hearing; that is the point which is set out in paragraph 6(2) of the present Notice of Appeal, which reads:

    "To the extent the Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of temporary employment opportunities during the relevant period and in making a percentage reduction for failure to mitigate the Tribunal erred in law misdirecting itself on the proper approach to the assessment of compensation in respect of past loss."
  1. By reference to Gardiner-Hill -v- Roland Berger Technics Ltd [1982] IRLR 498, Mr Glyn has satisfied us that this point is arguable on Appeal. We will let this Appeal therefore go to a full hearing on this ground only. Mr Glyn, in the course of argument, did not persuade us that there was anything else in the Notice of Appeal which would lead to a result favourable to the Appellant.
  2. The main point raised was the Respondent called no evidence at the Remedies Hearing. The fact that the Respondent failed to call evidence in a Remedies Hearing does not mean there was no evidence before the Tribunal to make finds of fact. The Tribunal heard from the Appellant at the hearing from which it was entitled to make findings of fact. We therefore dismiss all other grounds in the Notice of Appeal at this stage.
  3. Category C, ½ day.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/560_99_2607.html