BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Fowler (t/a Rockit Research Group) v. Rees [1999] UKEAT 79_99_1703 (17 March 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/79_99_1703.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 79_99_1703

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 79_99_1703
Appeal No. EAT/79/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 17 March 1999

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D M LEVY QC

MR L D COWAN

MR P R A JACQUES CBE



MR C FOWLER T/A ROCKIT RESEARCH GROUP APPELLANT

MR P A REES RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR C FOWLER
    Appellant in person
       


     

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE LEVY QC: In this appeal, Mr Sendall, at the Tribunal on the ELAAS scheme, is attending the Appellant, Mr C Fowler, because Mr Fowler has a sight disability. Mr Fowler's appeal arises in the following circumstances. An employee of Mr Fowler, Mr P A Rees, commenced proceedings in an Industrial Tribunal for damages for breach of contract and claiming that he had been unfairly dismissed. A preliminary point was taken that the employee had not been continuously employed for a period of not less than two years ending with the effective date of termination of his employment. That preliminary point was heard by a full employment tribunal sitting at Caernarfon on 3 November 1998. In Extended Reasons, the point was determined against the employer and in favour of the employee. From that judgment, the employer, trading as Rockit Research Group, appeals.

    We have explained to Mr Fowler that where a question of fact is determined by an Industrial Tribunal properly addressing itself on the appropriate law and they reach a conclusion, this Tribunal cannot interfere with the decision. It is our judgment, having looked at the Extended Reasons with some care, that the Industrial Tribunal did properly address the law and came to a finding of facts on that law, which is one which perhaps other Tribunals would not have reached but one which certainly an Industrial Tribunal was entitled to reach.

    In these circumstances, this appeal has no prospects of success. Accordingly, we determine it by dismissing it at this stage.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/79_99_1703.html