BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Purvis v. Luminar Leisure Ltd (t/a Chicago Rock Cafe) [2000] UKEAT 1332_99_1502 (15 February 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1332_99_1502.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 1332_99_1502

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 1332_99_1502
Appeal No. EAT/1332/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 15 February 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE H WILSON

MR J R CROSBY

MRS T A MARSLAND



MR D J PURVIS APPELLANT

LUMINAR LEISURE LTD T/AS CHICAGO ROCK CAFE RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

PRELIMINARY HEARING

Revised

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant THE APPELLANT IN PERSON
       


     

    JUDGE WILSON:-

  1. This is a preliminary hearing of the proposed appeal by the Applicant against the dismissal by the Employment Tribunal sitting at Exeter last year of his application alleging the breach of contract.
  2. Mr Purvis claims breach of contract in that he was summarily dismissed because none of the references that he had given had arrived back. However, in addition, a referee not named by him had been taken approaches and their reply to be adverse (although subsequently it was admitted to be wrong). He was summarily dismissed.
  3. He also complains that the grievance procedure which he activated was not operated as it should have been by the company's own standard.
  4. We consider that the matter should proceed to full argument, not on the grounds set out in the document submitted by Mr Purvis and dated 10th October 1999, but upon the following 3 questions:-
  5. (i) whether it was a breach of contract to seek a reference from a source other than the sources given by the Applicant to the Respondent and before answers had been received from those references given by the Applicant

    (ii) Whether it was a breach of contract to act upon adverse information which proved to be erroneous from an unauthorised referee without given the Applicant an opportunity to deal with that information.
    (iii) Whether or not the grievance procedure was correctly followed by the Respondent company and, if not, whether that fact should have affected the view taken by the Employment Tribunal.

    Category C – 1 hour


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1332_99_1502.html