[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> McDonald v. Camden [2001] UKEAT 1122_00_2003 (20 March 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1122_00_2003.html Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1122_00_2003, [2001] UKEAT 1122__2003

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

APPEARANCES

 

For the Appellant	MISS NAOMI CUNNINGHAM (Of Counsel) Free Representation Unit 4th Floor Peer House 8-14 Verulam Street London WC1X 8LZ


 


MR RECORDER LANGSTAFF QC

1. This case comes before us by way of Preliminary Hearing from Extended Reasons of the Employment Tribunal for London Central of 10 July 2000. The issue is whether or not the Appellant was an employee of the Respondent, at least in respect of his work as a car park attendant between November 1996 and October 1998.
2. We have given leave to substitute the grounds of appeal put forward to us by Miss Cunningham today, in substitution for the grounds of appeal which Mr McDonald himself had earlier drafted.
3. We should say no more than that these grounds appear to us to give a reasonably arguable case which we consider will take no more than half a day. It should be Category C. The Skeleton Argument in support of those grounds from both sides to be provided no less than 14 days prior to the hearing date, with copies of any authorities to be relied on no less than 7 days before the hearing.