[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Liggins v. Thameslink Rail Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1340_00_3004 (30 April 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1340_00_3004.html Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1340__3004, [2001] UKEAT 1340_00_3004

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

APPEARANCES

 

For the Appellant	MR D O'DEMPSEY (Of Counsel) Instructed by Messrs Russell Jones & Walker Solicitors Swinton House 324 Gray's Inn Road London WC1X 8DH


 


JUDGE WAKEFIELD

1. This is an Ex Parte Preliminary Hearing to determine whether the Appeal of Mr J Liggins should proceed to a full hearing. The decision appealed against is that of an Employment Tribunal sitting at London (South) in August 2000 which determined as a preliminary point that the Appellant was not disabled within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act.
2. The decision has been criticised before us on behalf of the Appellant on 2 bases. Firstly that the Employment Tribunal failed to take into account and make any findings as to past disability of the Appellant, which was relevant on the issue of the failure of the Respondent to confirm a job offer, and secondly that the Employment Tribunal failed to apply correctly the objective criteria as regards disability. On the latter point we have been referred to the case of Goodwin v The Patent Office [1999] ICR 302.
3. Having read the decision of the Employment Tribunal and having heard the arguments addressed to us today on behalf of the Appellant we do consider that the criticisms of the decision amount to matters of law which are arguable.
4. The case should proceed to a full hearing - Time Estimate 1 day - Category B. Skeleton arguments to be exchanged and filed not later than 14 days prior to the day of the hearing.