BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Brown v. Firth Rixson Special Steel Ltd [2002] UKEAT 1107_01_2802 (28 February 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/1107_01_2802.html
Cite as: [2002] UKEAT 1107_1_2802, [2002] UKEAT 1107_01_2802

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2002] UKEAT 1107_01_2802
Appeal No. EAT/1107/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 28 February 2002

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE HOLLAND

MR J R CROSBY

MS B SWITZER



MR JACK BROWN APPELLANT

FIRTH RIXSON SPECIAL STEEL LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

PRELIMINARY HEARING

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2002


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MISS RACHEL CRASNOW
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed By:
    Messrs Browne Jacobson
    Solicitors
    44 Castle Gate
    Nottingham
    NG1 7BJ
       


     

    MR JUSTICE HOLLAND:

  1. This matter comes before us today by way of a preliminary hearing. At issue is a decision of an Employment Tribunal held at Sheffield on 22 May 2001, the decision and extended reasons being sent to the parties on 3 August 2001. For the purposes of today's hearing we have had the benefit of a skeleton argument prepared by Miss Crasnow on behalf of the appellant, who was the applicant before the Tribunal. In our present judgment, the three points carefully set out by Miss Crasnow in paragraph 1 of her skeleton argument are all arguable and the matter should go forward so that they can be ventilated at an inter-parties hearing. For that purpose it is necessary for the Notice of Appeal to be amended so they can accommodate the third of the three points taken by Miss Crasnow. We give leave for that. We direct that the amended Notice of Appeal be served within the next 14 days. We further direct that there be an exchange of skeleton arguments for the purposes of the inter-parties hearing so that the exchange is completed at least 14 days before the hearing itself. So far as the length of the hearing is concerned, half a day is suggested and we agree.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/1107_01_2802.html