BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) >> Rooster Piri Piri Ltd v The Pensions Regulator [2025] UKFTT 41 (GRC) (20 January 2025)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/GRC/2025/41.html
Cite as: [2025] UKFTT 41 (GRC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Neutral citation number: [2025] UKFTT 41 (GRC)

 Case Reference FT/PEN/2024/0125

First-tier Tribunal

General Regulatory Chamber

Pensions Regulation

 

Determined in Chambers on 8 January 2025

Decision given on: 20 January 2025

 

Before

 

TRIBUNAL JUDGE FINDLAY

 

Between

 

ROOSTER PIRI PIRI LIMITED

Appellant

and

 

THE PENSIONS REGULATOR

Respondent

 

Decision: The appeal is struck out under Rule 8(2)(a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 ("the Rules").

 

 

REASONS

 

1.      The Appellant lodged an appeal with the Tribunal on 11 April 2024. The appeal relates to a fixed penalty dated 8 August 2022 and an escalating penalty notice dated 7 September 2022.

2.      An appeal to the Tribunal can only arise where a request for a review has been made within 28 days of the penalty and the penalty is upheld or a request for a review has been declined.

3.      The Respondent has stated that the review request was made outside the statutory 28 day period.

4.      As no valid review has taken place no appeal can be made to the Tribunal and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings.

5.      On 24 September 2024 a Direction was made as follows:

ˇ         The Tribunal is considering striking out the Appellant's appeal under Rule 8(2)(a) of the Rules on the basis that no appeal can be made unless a review request has been made within 28 days of the penalty.

ˇ         The Appellant was ordered to respond within 14 days. It was directed that the appeal would be reviewed after 14 days and an order made without a further hearing if it was appropriate to do so.

6.      The Appellant has not responded to the directions dated 24 September 2024.

7.      There are grounds to strike out the proceedings because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings  and the Appellant has been given an opportunity to make representation in relation to the proposed striking out and has failed to make any representation.

 

 

Signed: J Findlay                                                                                  Date: 8 January 2025


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/GRC/2025/41.html