James Carlyle Roddick v (1) Phillip Hopkins (2) Susan Hopkins (Boundary dispute : Determining exact line of boundary) [2019] UKFTT 383 (PC) (03 May 2019)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> James Carlyle Roddick v (1) Phillip Hopkins (2) Susan Hopkins (Boundary dispute : Determining exact line of boundary) [2019] UKFTT 383 (PC) (03 May 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/2018_0613.html
Cite as: [2019] UKFTT 383 (PC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[2019] UKFTT 383 (PC). Determined boundary application re part of the common boundary between the parties' respective titles. Applicant claimed that the true boundary was marked by the line of a laurel hedge, but was unable to point to any historical or other evidence which supported this contention. The application failed.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2019] UKFTT 383 (PC).pdf

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/2018_0613.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> James Carlyle Roddick v (1) Phillip Hopkins (2) Susan Hopkins (Boundary dispute : Determining exact line of boundary) [2019] UKFTT 383 (PC) (03 May 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/2018_0613.html Cite as: [2019] UKFTT 383 (PC)