 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Chief Constable Cleveland Police (Police and criminal justice) [2025] UKICO 326700 (5 March 2025) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2025/326700.html Cite as: [2025] UKICO 326700 |
||
[New search] [Help]
Link for IOC full Decision notice pdf file: Chief Constable Cleveland Police (Police and criminal justice) [2025] UKICO 326700 (5 March 2025)
The complainant has requested information about the vetting status of officers working on a police operation from Cleveland Police. Cleveland Police provided some information but refused to provide the remainder citing section 40(2)(Personal information) of FOIA. The complainant raised various matters for consideration. The Commissioner finds no breach of section 16(1) (Advice and assistance). However, he finds that Cleveland Police breached section 10(1) (Time for compliance) by failing to comply with section 1(1)(a) within the statutory time period and section 17(1)(b) (Refusal of request) by issuing an inadequate refusal notice. The Commissioner also finds that section 40(2)(personal information) is not engaged and he requires Cleveland Police to disclose the most recent approved vetting date of those working on Operation Magnolia at the time of the request.