BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Kevin Hickey (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o23112 (7 June 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o23112.html
Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o23112

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Kevin Hickey (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o23112 (7 June 2012)

Patent decision

BL number
O/231/12
Concerning rights in
GB 0913355.4
Hearing Officer
Dr J E Porter
Decision date
7 June 2012
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Kevin Hickey
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 section 1(1)(b)
Keywords
Inventive step
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention concerned a device for showing correct ladder angle, comprising a weighted indicator connected via a hoop to a semi-circular rail, positioned near the top of a symbol ‘A’. The indicator moved along the rail as the ladder incline changed. Correct ladder angle was shown by alignment with a marking within a limb of the ‘A’, and the width of the limbs of the ‘A’ indicated the limits of acceptable ladder angle.

The Hearing Officer considered that the skilled person would have an engineering background and his common general knowledge would include knowledge of a variety of fixed and moveable couplings. The Hearing Officer then considered the prior art ladder inclination indicators, which showed weighted indicators freely mounted on a pivot, interacting with symbols or scales of some sort to indicate either the correct or a range of acceptable ladder angles. He found that the skilled person would not be exercising any inventive ingenuity in replacing the pivot mechanism with a hoop or rail for allowing the weighted indicator freely to indicate angle. Nor would that person be exercising any inventiveness in noting the teaching of the prior art and using some form of symbol to mark the position of the weighted indicator when at the optimum angle and at the limits of acceptable or safe angles. The application was refused.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o23112


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o23112.html