London Borough of Bexley v KM (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits - liability, commerciality and contrivance [regulations 8 and 9]) [2017] UKUT 354 (AAC) (29 August 2017)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> London Borough of Bexley v KM (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits - liability, commerciality and contrivance [regulations 8 and 9]) [2017] UKUT 354 (AAC) (29 August 2017)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/354.html
Cite as: [2017] UKUT 354 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

The claimant formed a relationship with one of the two joint owners of a property and lived with her as her partner. When they split up, she remained in the propery occupying a spare bedroom and paying rent. How does regulation 9(1)(c) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 apply?

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 354.pdf

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/354.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> London Borough of Bexley v KM (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits - liability, commerciality and contrivance [regulations 8 and 9]) [2017] UKUT 354 (AAC) (29 August 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/354.html Cite as: [2017] UKUT 354 (AAC)