SL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) and Carlisle City Council (HB) (Tribunal procedure and practice - set aside applications) [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC) (9 February 2017)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) and Carlisle City Council (HB) (Tribunal procedure and practice - set aside applications) [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC) (9 February 2017)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/64.html
Cite as: [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Adequacy of reasons in FTT’s decision refusing to set aside substantive decisions. Significance of rule 34(2) of Tribunal Rules (First-tier Tribunal) (SEC) Rules 2008 taken together with common law expectations: paragraphs 28 - 34; procedural error for rule 37 vs error of law or fact.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 64.pdf

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/64.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) and Carlisle City Council (HB) (Tribunal procedure and practice - set aside applications) [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC) (9 February 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/64.html Cite as: [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC)