SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP : Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity : planning and following journeys) [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC) (5 September 2019)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP : Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity : planning and following journeys) [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC) (5 September 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2019/274.html
Cite as: [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC) (5 September 2019)

Judicial Summary

If a person is able to drive is that sufficient, of itself, to justify a conclusion s/he can follow the route of a journey?

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2019/274.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP : Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity : planning and following journeys) [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC) (5 September 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2019/274.html Cite as: [2019] UKUT 274 (AAC)