SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Tribunal procedure and practice - fair hearing) [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC) (11 June 2020)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Tribunal procedure and practice - fair hearing) [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC) (11 June 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/198.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC) (11 June 2020)

"1. The tribunal should have adjourned in order to obtain clarification whether a person appearing for the Appellant was the appointee (as claimed) or to give the Appellant an opportunity to authorise her to represent her. It was unfair to proceed with the hearing in circumstances where the putative appointee/representative was not permitted to participate fully. 2. (Obiter) The tribunal administration did not have power to reject an application for permission to appeal on grounds of lateness or lack of a statement of reasons. The application should have been put before a judge."

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/198.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Tribunal procedure and practice - fair hearing) [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC) (11 June 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/198.html Cite as: [2020] UKUT 198 (AAC)