RA v First-tier Tribunal and Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (JR) (Criminal injuries compensation) [2020] UKUT 31 (AAC) (29 January 2020)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> RA v First-tier Tribunal and Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (JR) (Criminal injuries compensation) [2020] UKUT 31 (AAC) (29 January 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/31.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 31 (AAC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Paragraph 13 of the 2008 Scheme creates a discretion. Where paragraph 13 applies, the First-tier Tribunal must exercise it, including considering a ball-park figure for quantum where it may be relevant to the exercise of discretion, and must show how it has exercised it. R(RW) v First-tier Tribunal (CIC) [2012] UKUT 280 (AAC) followed.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 31 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/31.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> RA v First-tier Tribunal and Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (JR) (Criminal injuries compensation) [2020] UKUT 31 (AAC) (29 January 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/31.html Cite as: [2020] UKUT 31 (AAC)