BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Edward Williams v (1) Information Commissioner; (2) Chief Constable of Kent Police (Information rights) [2021] UKUT 149 (AAC) (21 June 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/149.html
Cite as: [2021] WLR(D) 494, [2021] UKUT 149 (AAC), [2022] WLR 259, [2022] 1 WLR 259

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Buy ICLR report: [2022] 1 WLR 259] [View ICLR summary: [2021] WLR(D) 494] [Help]


Edward Williams v (1) Information Commissioner; (2) Chief Constable of Kent Police (Information rights) [2021] UKUT 149 (AAC) (21 June 2021)


Section 30(1)(a)(i) of Freedom of Information Act - exemption from disclosure for information held for the purpose of a criminal investigation (ascertaining whether a person should be charged with a criminal offence) - Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000 - detention and questioning under Schedule 7 not per se a criminal investigation - requires a fact specific analysis of whether the information generated by the schedule 7 port stop and questioning was held for the purposes of a criminal investigation - First Tier Tribunal failed to conduct such an exercise but wrongly determined that use of schedule 7 powers in relation to a person automatically rendered the information held for the purposes of a criminal investigation - appeal allowed and case remitted to a freshly constituted FTT to decide if any relevant FOIA exemptions may apply including sections 24 (national security), 31 (law enforcement) or 40 (personal information).

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2021] UKUT 149 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/149.html