NS & RS v Kent County Council (Special educational needs) [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC) (10 December 2021)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> NS & RS v Kent County Council (Special educational needs) [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC) (10 December 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/311.html
Cite as: [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC), [2022] ELR 451

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

NS & RS v Kent County Council [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC) (10 December 2021)

Special educational needs - Upper Tribunal procedure – application for costs – whether unreasonable conduct in naming particular placement in section I – whether unreasonable conduct in not putting in evidence in opposition to parents' case but putting them to proof - rule 10 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (HESC) Rules 2008

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/311.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> NS & RS v Kent County Council (Special educational needs) [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC) (10 December 2021) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/311.html Cite as: [2021] UKUT 311 (AAC), [2022] ELR 451