LH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity 1: planning and following journeys) [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC) (4 February 2022)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> LH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity 1: planning and following journeys) [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC) (4 February 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2022/32.html
Cite as: [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

LH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC) (4 February 2022)

Tribunal practice and procedure - Statements of Reasons – concessions - whether Tribunal obliged to explain why it decided against greater points award for Appellant when that award was recommended in Respondent's submissions - Personal Independence Payment - Mobility Activity 2

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2022/32.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> LH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity 1: planning and following journeys) [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC) (4 February 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2022/32.html Cite as: [2022] UKUT 32 (AAC)