[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> NSP v Stoke-on-Trent City Council & GP (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits - recovery of overpayments, Revisions, supersessions and reviews - ignorance of material fact) [2022] UKUT 86 (AAC) (17 March 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2022/86.html Cite as: [2022] UKUT 86 (AAC) |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
NSP v Stoke-on-Trent City Council & GP (HB) [2022] UKUT 86 (AAC) (17 March 2022)
As is the case for benefits administered by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and in the child support scheme, a "material" fact for the purposes of regulation 4 (Revision of decisions) and regulation 7 (Decisions superseding earlier decisions) of the Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Decisions and Appeals) Regulations 2001 is one that actually does make a difference to the outcome decision and not one that might have done so: CIS/3655/2007 and CA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and TB (CSM) [2020] UKUT 205 (AAC) followed.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2022] UKUT 86 (AAC)